After the cold war ended there has been a lot of fear mongering but now it seams that the United States has settled on a 'War on Terror' to try and make world politics a case of with us or against us again.
Just look at how they are allowing Israel to continue its attack on Lebanon because it agrees with their 'defense against terrorists' right to attack other countries.
So at any rate, is it a good thing to have a polarized world again? Do we really need another political climate that will spawn countless little wars and violations of International Law? (Look at Vietnam, Cambodia, Nicaragua etc and then now at Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan)
2006-08-01 01:20:32 · 9 answers · asked by A Drunken Man 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I didnt say that it is only the United States, im just asking a question about it. Doi
2006-08-01 01:35:23 · update #1
The United States was found guilty of state funded terrorist acts against Nicaragua
2006-08-01 01:37:48 · update #2
No, I think it is a very bad thing - unless you make a lot of money on weapons, like the people who support Dubya do.
2006-08-01 01:24:37 · answer #1 · answered by Gungnir 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Empires fall apart" Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote the Grand Chessboard.. in it he explains how the Soviet Union lost the cold war due to it's inflexible Dogmatic, theocratic rule... America could be well on it's way to this same inflexibility .. we can't sustain as a Democracy or Federalized Republic which is what we actually are.. with an overbearing fundamentalist approach. The only way for the big Biz dogs to hold it together is to have a dictatorship... and like W said "It would be much easier if we were a dictatorship" don't think that can't happen here people. The Empire is on a roll and they ain't gonna give it up without a fight...
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html
2006-08-01 01:28:19 · answer #2 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ou do not recognize what a international conflict is, do you? WWII had conflict virtually everywhere yet continental u . s . of america. Our international occupation existed previously 9/11. it really is covert ops/ particular ops for ya. In there previously the conflict occurs.
2016-11-27 05:43:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vietnam = emerging democracy
Cambodia = emerging democracy
Nicaragua = democracy
Lebanon = democracy
Iraq = democracy
Afghanistan = democracy
I say "Go Polarization!"
2006-08-01 01:28:36 · answer #4 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drink some coffee your obviously drunk again.
In your slurry of drunkiness I thought you were trying to say that you support terrorism.
2006-08-01 01:52:36 · answer #5 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just "us" huh? Well "drunken man" crawl back into that bottle cause you don't know sh*t
2006-08-01 01:28:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
all we are saying , is give peace a chance
2006-08-01 01:26:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, no
usa will find difficulty if they have to fight united enemy
2006-08-01 01:26:13 · answer #8 · answered by arifin ceper 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2006-08-01 01:26:14 · answer #9 · answered by JAMES 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋