Anybody who spreads terror is a terrorist. If George W Bush spread terror in Iraq, could i him a terrorist?

Question

sorry for the mispelling, I actually meant: "could I call him a terrorist"?

Answer 1

I answered a few other friends too that stop calling him only a terrorist, G W Bush is a FUC**N War criminal, a terrorist and should not only be called as terrorists but to send him to prison and he should face a trail.

Answer 2

Thats good question

Since G Bush is the head of the Amreican Armed Forces he should be held accountable for all the atrocities and crimes against the civilians committed by the marines in Iraq and Afganistan.Saddam hussain is on trial for the same crimes against his own people what makes Bush different?

The fact that America could not find any WMD's in Iraq after the invasion makes this invasion more of a personal grudge rather than "saving the world" from saddam

Answer 3

I believe he is more than a terrorist. People who cause terror do so for a reason (do get there land back, out of frustration with there governement). George Bush is causing terror to gain oil i.e. more money, for fun, to spread his version of democracy, and does so under the cloack of good. He is hypocritical and deceives many people. So in my eyes he is worse than a terrorist, I'd go as far as to say even worse than Hitler.

George Bush has rippled economies all over the world. On top of that he also has indirectly (via Israel) and directly(Iraq, Afghanistan) caused the deaths of many innocent people without a substantial reason. What weapons of mass destruction? Wheres osama? Is osama even guilty of anything? He hasn't even been tried out in a court. ANd how many people have died under the hand of bush only to be told "sorry, made a mistake, but we got saddam" even though thousands of people died in the process.

At least Hitler had a reason albeit be it a weak one. And his destruction to countries infrastructure wasn't as bad as Bush.

Answer 4

Loser your name is perfect for you. You people are so ungrateful. You are the reason why we don't rush to help other countries around the world, because of ungrateful bastards like yourself.

You know who the real terrorist are and don't let your mommy and daddy tell you otherwise. Ask yourself why your country is so rich with natural resources and your people don't get any benefits of it.

Why are there people in your country wasting all the money that they received from other countries for their oil and natural resource, then you will know who the real terrorist are? They same people you are backing are the same people who are unbelievable rich, while you are poor.

Don't be blinded by their hate, ask your government why you don't have a better life than the one that you now have.

Answer 5

Yes, you could. I've heard a quote once: the difference between war and terrorism is that terrorism is cheaper.

Answer 6

yes sure..he's the head of all terrorist. because other terrorist attacks buildings, people, but Bush attacks countries.

Answer 7

Flaw with your question, W is fighting the terrorist, NOT spreading it

Answer 8

Yes you will be right if you call him terrorist. Bush, Blair & Olmert are in same catagorey i.e. they are same as Osama is for westerners and americans. Bush, Blair & Olmert are terrorists for Muslims. all of us must get rid of them.

Answer 9

Yes you can, not because you could
or freedom of speach

BECAUSE ITS A FACT

come on people, open your eyes


dont be so paitriot when its not right to be one....
Be reasonable, follow the facts!

Answer 10

If you want to. But if you kill a man who's raping and murdering your sister or mother, by your own logic, wouldn't you be a rapist-murderer too?