Yeah im definately for it.. whatever keeps ignorant people from having off spring im all for it lol..
2006-08-01 00:31:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by brwneyedgrl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I believe in contraception. But I believe that both parties should be responsible for taking precautions. It's very important to teach our children that they are responsible for their own actions, even contraception. The more they are informed the more they will understand that there is more to worry about then contraception alone. If we don't educate our children about contraception and protection, who will? We certainly don't need any more teenage girls getting pregnant then we already have. Contraception is a must.
2006-08-01 02:20:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mary J 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, if there were no contraception there would be alot more people living in poverty because they would not be able to afford the amount of children they have. Children would suffer more, there would be more abuse to both children and women from stressed mothers and fathers who cannot make ends meet. There would be more youth homelessness, there would be more drug taking, crime would rise, the possibilities are endless.
Yes sex is meant to be for procreation, but in reality, people have hormones and they are just going to have sex.
2006-08-01 00:51:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by having_a_blonde_day_lol 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes! I am a mother of two. I was on birth control for a long time and then i had my tubes tied and now i had a partial hysterectomy. No worries here. All precautions should be used because some people don't need to be having babies
2006-08-01 00:47:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by spoiledrotten 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it truly relies upon on whether you're in a solid dating and whether or no longer you opt to get pregnant of direction! i'm in favour of the tablet, i think of that's superb, just about one hundred% precise, and has different well-being reward as nicely, inclusive of clearer dermis and greater many times occurring, beter classes. although there are various adverse aspects so i'm no longer asserting merely anyon would desire to pass on it. Condoms are the main complication-unfastened contraceptive yet are in lots of cases rejected through actuality they only artwork if used properly (that's an identical for something i assume) yet additionally through fact they shrink sensativity. common i could say specific, birth control is healthful and a miles greater advantageous option to an undesirable being pregnant that would consequence in abortion. desire this facilitates.
2016-10-01 08:23:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. There are many reasons, despite the pious responses. Some people flat out shouldn't breed. Ever seen an unwanted or abused child? I have. Many people aren't ready for parenthood. Then there's the whole overpopulation debate... or is it God's will???
2006-08-01 01:41:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mike 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I am. I think you should have the choice. It would be better to have protection then get some STD or have an unwanted child. I think the ideas of the church are a little out of date and reflect the thinking of an earlier time.
2006-08-01 00:44:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by carpau0 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Contraceptives including condoms, diaphrams etc. are needed in these days of promiscuity and casual sex. It helps with keeping unwanted pregnancies from happening as well as STD's and the transmitting of the HIV/AIDS virus's.
I'm for abstinence unless in a committed relationship!
2006-08-01 00:35:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by aunt_beeaa 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes. people need to have control over their own bodies. Children are a gift, but not everyone is ready to receive and then the children suffer
2006-08-01 00:30:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by {Lisa} 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely! It protects, as well as not to bring new Innocent lives into this world. It's the babies that do the real suffering ....usually.
2006-08-01 00:39:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Benj 2
·
0⤊
0⤋