He was sued FOR stealing money. Are people sued for stealing money? Possibly better to say he was sued for fraud. Or am I just a sad anorak?
2006-07-31 22:26:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wendyberyl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was sued for stealing money is the correct way of saying it!
2006-07-31 22:26:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by little.lost 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
he was sued for stealing money; however, a person doesn't get sued for stealing money. He is generally arrested and put into jail until he is tried by a judge and jury.
2006-07-31 22:27:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by wunderkind 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. He was sued FOR stealing money.
2006-07-31 23:12:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Echo Forest 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was sued FOR stealing money...it still doesn't make sense tho? Maybe it's he was USED to stealing money?
2006-07-31 22:24:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by fallito 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it should be: "He was sued for stealing money." Makes no sense actually.
2006-07-31 22:24:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by shortgirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It looks like a spelling mistake. He was "used" to stealing money would make sense.
2006-07-31 22:37:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by scotsman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is the word "used"? He was used to stealing money?
2006-07-31 22:55:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A lost case. A legal expert won't assist you in this mess. Your mom owed the money and became attempting to cover it out of your grandfather. That became incorrect to start with and the courts do no longer help people who're attempting to do the incorrect situation and then do no longer in basic terms like the outcomes.
2016-11-03 10:48:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by lurette 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. He was sued because he stole money.
2006-07-31 22:24:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋