English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-31 19:42:17 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Good point. Mel Gibson is from Australia, but he lives here. You don't have to be born in the U.S. to be an ambassador.

2006-07-31 19:55:00 · update #1

12 answers

Mel isn't a American I'm sorry to say, he's Australian...

2006-07-31 19:50:49 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 13 0

Lol.

I don't think the US goverment will "ever" appoint Mel Gibson as an ambassador to Israel, and I doubt if Mel Gibson will accept it.

He's sorry about the incident, though.

And, he's making a new film now.. the passion of Hezbollah.

2006-08-01 03:02:48 · answer #2 · answered by Dawn Treader 5 · 0 0

Yep.

See, as usual, people are not getting the entire story. The man made a movie about Christ and was withstood by the Jewish powers dominating Hollywood. The man lived under extreme stress because he made a movie about Christ. Why? Cause Jews hate Christianity. See, the bigotry started there, with Jewish hatred. Who are they to try and stop or pressure Mel for making a movie about Christ? They did just that. It was they who started the stress on his life. That stress was building up and hurting his career in a city dominated by Jews. When he got drunk, all of that stress just poured on out.

How does Hollywood become dominated by Jews? Who gets a movie? Who gets a promo? Who gets advanced? Why so many Jewish actors getting jobs? Are Jews promoting Jews, to the hurt of other non-Jews? Why am I anti-Semitic for pointing out bigotry?

Mel was not an anti-Semite. If he is now, surely, it's the Jews doing. How is a man supposed to respond to pressure like that? Except to hate them. (and still Mel doesn't hate them) And again, why do Jewish people have such a dominating stronghold over all the media and so many other areas of our lives?

2006-08-03 10:31:13 · answer #3 · answered by io_sono_paolo2000 2 · 0 0

No, they should appoint Mel Gibson as ambassador to Ted Kennedy.

2006-08-01 03:19:54 · answer #4 · answered by CHEVICK_1776 4 · 0 0

No, we should just keep busting him until he realizes he is in America. He grew that long beard, I thought he was going Al-qaeda there for a while.
Forget the US post office-we can now say, I'm fixing to go al-qaeda on yo a$$.
Mel means well, but, Australia will be better off if he go's home.

2006-08-01 03:11:06 · answer #5 · answered by phwar68 5 · 0 0

I think it is a brilliant idea. At least he can teach Israeli journalists some manners. Unfortunately, the assholes in the White House would never appoint him for such a possession.

2006-08-02 11:11:18 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0 0

I think so you would not want to send him to Saudi Arabia until he gets that problem with "the jesus juice" in check.
I am a little concerned about sending him to Israel. I think it would be difficult for him to live with the people that killed our lord.

2006-08-01 10:50:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If this is a joke about his recent arrest its not funny. What stupid thing have you done that should be beaten to death by the press?

2006-08-01 02:49:18 · answer #8 · answered by Stew 3 · 0 0

Why not. He already has a heads up on Hebrew, and all other types of brew also.

2006-08-01 12:37:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ha!

2006-08-01 02:48:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers