America is flexing its muscles in all conflicts of states. It always has a role of being the policeman of the world up to such extent that it intrudes into the activities of nations just like in Afghanistan and Iraq. Let nations solve their own disputes by amicable settlements rather than invasions.
2006-07-31 19:23:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know that it is, but it does seem to be trying to become one. USofAn's seem to have a real problem believing that US law does not extend beyond the boundaries of the country, which is really weird when you consider how different state and county laws are within the boundaries of the USofA.
It doesn't help the perceptions of other countries and peoples, when the USofA's government tries to impose treaties and trade agreements on other countries, agrees to treaties and trade agreements with other countries and then ignores or violates them while insisting the other countries keep them.
It doesn't help when 'Multinational' companies who are based in the USofA, funded by US Dollars and where the profits go back into the USofA, ignore the laws of other countries and agreed international laws when operating in those countries, and yet are not held accountable to those laws that are passed within the USofA.
While the people of the USofA, are individually good and moral people, the impression the whole of the USofA's people to the world is that they are immoral, antisocial and completely bad, ignoring their own God's commandments just so they can live as they want to, to the cost of the rest of the world.
When you consider that the USofA's Government has broken almost every treaty they have signed, when it's companies have done the same with almost every trade agreement, and when it has broken most if not all of the international laws that the USofA's Government insisted get passed in the UN, not even counting all the international laws it agreed to (but hadn't sponsored) that have been broken, the USofA seems to be more of a bully, a coward, a dictator, and a Godless country, than it could ever be considered a world leader and a supporter of democratic justice.
Very sad.
2006-07-31 19:36:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by whatotherway 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but for the people that say we should stay out of world affairs. That would have Hitler happy, but the Jews, Poles, Russians, French and other Europeans sad.( should have let him keep France) Japan would have been real happy in the 1940's but China, Burma, India, Australia, and the Philippines sorta sad. North Korea would have been real happy in the 1950's but South Korea real sad. The Taliban would be happy but alot of Afghanistan sad, Saddam would be happy but Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the Kurds he was killing by the thousands pretty sad.
America may spend more on Defense than the rest of the world but we spend more on Humanitarian aid than the rest of the world also. America is also the biggest contributor to the UN in money plus the rent free building and land. I hope America stays out of world politics for about 10 years and watches part of the world starve and die of disease, and some of the world kill itself off. I'm sure if America leaves the Middle East the Shiites and Sunnis will work each other over pretty good, until Iran steps in again (another 7 years) or the Turks just finish off both. North Korea will be free to attack South Korea, and most of Africa will starve completely. While the UN looks for new housing and funding. Sounds great to this American
2006-07-31 19:47:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by mark g 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not becoming, America has dominated global politics for half a century. They have been involved in 80 Military interventions of the past 50 years in every sphere of influence, have a defense budget that exceeds the rest of the world put together, have supported dictators like Pinochet and Suharto, overthrown democracies in Eastern Europe and South America and pretty much intrude and impose pressure everywhere.
This is increasing with Pax Americana, as outlined by thinktanks like the Project for a New American Century, and with individuals like Wolfowitz and Perl in positions of such consequence.
2006-07-31 19:26:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by corpuscollossus 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without even thinking too much - YES! Bush has become a new Hitler but lies constantly. There is no Al Qaeda in Iraq but he claims the Americans are fighting them. Remember that Saddam killed many thousands of Shi'ite Moslems.
The manipulation of most Western countries by infiltration by the CIA is unbelievable. This is exampled by the war in Iraq. Saddam got into power because the CIA supported, financed & weaponed-up Saddam against the then in-power Government to destabilise. They do this regularly in the middle east. After the Iranian war & connection with the USSR the American president, George Bush (daddy), attacked them. Now his son does it.
The support for Israel, the occupiers in the Middle East, against Palestine is terrorism.
2006-07-31 19:31:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rex Alfie L 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
formally, we've been lower than Martial regulation because the Civil conflict. it is merely under no circumstances been rescinded. it really is why once you bypass right into a courtroom of regulation the gold fringe is around the yank flag as an instance that is a protection rigidity Tribunal listening to. Our Congress is a moot aspect and they, besides as judges, are illegally occupying seats. They recognize this, even if the large majority of the fave public would not. that is a lifeless ringer for there aren't any guidelines that can provide our authorities the right to tax our wages. Ask an IRS agent. no longer something on the books. The FEMA camps look bases for the military and Air rigidity. variety of makes you ask your self why they're in position after we've had the yank pink bypass for emergency amenities.
2016-11-27 05:25:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way; in fact we are in the far minority position of the United Nations. The world is being divided between capitalist and socialist states. The capitalist states are the more successful, but the socialistic states are far more numerous; and they want pay offs from the capitalist in a big way. The United States merely leads the capitalist drive; but is still in the minority in a big way.
2006-07-31 19:21:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree, our government seems to think our way of life is the only right way, and if you don't agree and don't live by our rules we will MAKE you, this doesn't apply to all I.E. China, Russia, or anybody else that could potentially kick our butts, we only talk tuff to the little guys, like Iraq, Syria, Iran, Etc.. Our government has turned into a bunch of bully's.
2006-07-31 21:58:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Prez. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Becoming a dictator? ...........hahahahhahaha.........
well you already invaded Iraq to secure the oil (in breach of international Law).
When Bush tells Blair to bend over, Tony says , "how low".
USA controls Saudi, Kuwait and generally controls the region.
The only country US can't touch is Israel.
Putting pressure on Canada to develop new oilfields for US consumption.
Attempting to assist a bloody revolution in Venezuela against it's hugely popular president.
USA spies on UN headquarters.
Spies on everyone else, including now its own citizens, apparently.
2006-07-31 19:36:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gent 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its call power.
Power of economy, couple with WMD.
Military might, America has the most advance weapon. So every other nation invest or use American dollar...
That perception has given the American Governement the right to nose into everyone else business; to protect the american dollar, interest and might.
Weaker nation, allows it, because they want to be on friendly terms with USA so they get trade offer with American.
Yes, to your question.
2006-07-31 19:25:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by rick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋