I heard that somewhere maybe a commercial. Ahh I love art I have a painting I should take a pic of and put on the internet any one have any thoughts on? in? transcending this quote?
Love CA
2006-07-31 19:10:02 · 10 answers · asked by orca baby 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Other - Visual Arts
Art is for the heart its what you want it to be
2006-07-31 19:12:57 · answer #1 · answered by KitKat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, art (drawing, sculpture, painting, photography) has the ability to create harmony, discord, rhythm, beat, counterpoint, and can be classified as classical, modern...and so on. It can be soft, loud or both. Artists often work to music to help them establish a flow, from subconciousness through the arms and hands, into the medium and into the final piece, making music an integral part of the art. Whether it enters the ear or the eye, both music and art create similar reactions, emotions, and sometimes behaviour. There are messages to be seen or heard and when it works right, a communication is set up between artist/musician and patron/fan. Play Matisse or play Bach...watch Swan Lake or The Dancers (Degas)...you get the picture.
2006-07-31 22:22:03 · answer #2 · answered by Victor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love art too. I just got into glass fusing and loving it. I make stained glass stepping stones and mosaic art. I do love music to as long as I can understand the words. Not sure if I understand your question fully, but I thought you might want to talk with someone.
During the school year I tutor small children, I love that too. I was a volunteer for Valley Children's Hospital in Madera for about a year.
We have four children, and five grand. The grand. are a blast, and the children, well I'm glad I don't have to pay for their braces anymore.
Tell me about yourself.
bob s.
2006-07-31 19:50:42 · answer #3 · answered by bob s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, I'm sure blind musicians would argue "no", and deaf painters would definitely disagree with the "art is music" statement. Aesthetics are simply that, in whatever combination we are lucky enough in our time on this Earth to experience or provide them. I'm both a musician and an artist, but I can scarcely find a true translation from one to another, merely points where the two collide. So, the creative process is truly the unifying factor between the two, not the media themselves.
2006-07-31 19:19:16 · answer #4 · answered by stimpy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so escpecially for those who cannot hear music - it stimulates the eyes and mind and makes you think in the same way art does - makes you search your soul and everyone interprets each in their own way based on their life experience.
2006-07-31 19:14:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rather, music is art for the ears.
2006-07-31 19:13:39 · answer #6 · answered by Bad-Bird 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe music is art for the ears
2006-07-31 19:14:00 · answer #7 · answered by hitominojyuunin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be a good description.
2006-07-31 19:13:32 · answer #8 · answered by mybluemax1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
very nice description ,i think it is
2006-07-31 19:31:30 · answer #9 · answered by mosi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nah. not even close.
2006-07-31 19:14:19 · answer #10 · answered by andrew 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋