Especially when it comes to facts about Islam and leftists?
2006-07-31 17:58:43 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.zombietime.com/hall_of_shame/
2006-07-31 17:59:24 · update #1
I know I see many leftards get away with cursing, bigotry, and hate speech. Sort of makes one want to say, "Hell with Yahoo and sell all of your stock"
2006-07-31 18:01:18 · update #2
Skerry, did you get busted for hurting some murderous militant facist's feelings AGAIN??
Tsk tsk...
Don't you know if you're just nice to them, they'll be nice to us? Yahoo just wants to spread the LUVVVVVVVVVVV.....
2006-07-31 19:51:49 · answer #1 · answered by LastNerveLost 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Personally, if someone is honest about their question, they should be allowed to ask it. I mean, even if it sounds hateful--We can help others work through their hate by an honest reply to their question. Censorship has a place, I guess, but I have seen it overdone on here.
For instance, one time a guy on here asked "Why do white people smell like wet dog, when they get wet? Seriously, is it chemical or what?" When I read is question, I was intrigued. I mean, I'm white and I had never heard, but had always wondered if we had a smell. So, I responded to his question and actually thanked him for asking the question because it made me want to research to find out if others had noticed that and why? But when I hit submit -- it said his question had been removed. I thought the guy was just curious and being honest, and I thought GEEZ...come on....
2006-07-31 18:11:14 · answer #2 · answered by makingthisup 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that Yahoo is a card carryin liberal leftist piece of you know what! You can't even use fag on Literati, as of just a couple weeks ago. It's stupid and sissified to give credence to the left and gay (YOU GUYS MESSED UP A GOOD WORD THERE!) and try to change a good America to a freakin antidisestablishmentarianism! HAH! See those little ***'s? See what I mean? I merely used the word for 'happy' and we can't even do that !
2006-07-31 18:08:00 · answer #3 · answered by ravin_lunatic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My, better pull in your horns for a while Skerry. For some on who dishes out a continuous screed against everyone who disagrees with you I don't see what you have to complain about.
so you got censored, lucky you didn't get booted for good.
You forget that Yahoo is a privately owned company and you signed an agreement with them to participate in Answers. They don't owe you squat.
There are also guidelines and if you choose to ignore them, its your own fault.
As for other people not getting nabbed, its only a matter of time. Even cops can't nab everyone who runs a red light. Get over yourself and quit whining. One of your lines, I think.
2006-07-31 18:57:23 · answer #4 · answered by friscolady 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We can only hope that you will continue to consider the rules of a privately owned site to be "censorship" and leave - thus allowing intelligent beings (like, oh I don't know - field mice, which would be smarter than you) to debate politics without the interruptions of morons.
2006-07-31 18:36:27 · answer #5 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could bring up the topic at the annual shareholders meeting I suppose.
I'm only a freeloading guest of Yahoo!.
2006-07-31 18:07:45 · answer #6 · answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sucks, but private company, private rules. If they are getting federal funding, then they should have to have full on non-censorship. But as far as I know it's not a government funded company on any level.
2006-07-31 21:04:29 · answer #7 · answered by cat_Rett_98 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both "sides" want to censor everyone. The neo-cons want to censor anyone who dares criticize the Savior of America (TM), Bush. The liberals want to make sure your speech is politically correct.
(No, I'm not a liberal. I'm conservative, not Bushbot neo-con.)
2006-07-31 18:17:43 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
only have been given reported as quickly as for a stupid reason, i became going to attraction it, yet different solutions suggested they only enable captivating to sound truthful. I recommend in step with probability it happened some cases, yet i think of they have been kidding. only circulate alongside with it, examine the guiellines and words of provider only IN CASE, then delete your digital mail speaking approximately it. absolutely everyone gets reported from time to time, and it;'s in many cases for stupid motives, if any.
2016-12-10 19:11:48 · answer #9 · answered by niang 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what ever happened to the notion of free speach! Yahoo cant hold us down, set up a blog and retaliate. I bet they dont like that response!
2006-07-31 18:34:29 · answer #10 · answered by ladsout 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you hate it so much, why are you here? Get over yourself. Seriously, go find a hobby or something, and stop bothering the rest of us who prefer do deal with real questions.
2006-07-31 18:04:16 · answer #11 · answered by SomeoneUdunno 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋