You have no idea what youre talking about whatsoever. None. Not a single clue.
2006-07-31 17:45:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
........ Well you don't seem to be aware that Israel is in the early stages of invading .....The Lebanon.
The Lebanon IS a democratic nation and the democratic process there is now endorsed by the USA government.
If Israel would wish to establish a democracy then it would be best served by starting in its own country and returning the land and property which Jews stole from the indigenous Muslim and christian population.
Israel was further instrumental in supporting South Africa's former racist (apartheid) governments with weapons of torture , munitions and security /intelligence services (in breach of international law) in order to ensure the survival of the former White Supremacist government for decades.
You should be aware that It is the USA and to a lesser extent Great Britain which ensures the survival of the corrupt Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in order to ensure unrestricted flow of oil supplies. True democracy in Saudi Arabia would likely lead to regional oil producers holding the west to ransom by restricting supplies. Also many would say that democracy there would lead to unrestricted support for Al-queda.
2006-08-01 01:09:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gent 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Israel is close allies with BOTH Kuwait AND Saudi Arabia. In fact, the U.S. is scheduled to build 60 more military bases on Saudi soil (i guess that tells you what we can expect in the region!) If they were to invade anybody it would be the country's that aren't puppets to the west. The country's that still want to chart their own destiny.
2006-08-01 00:52:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by makavelllii 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither of those nations are dictatorships. Kuwait has a parliamentary monarchy, and Saudi Arabia is ruled by the royal family. Do some homework before opting to blindly endorse Zionist aggression.
2006-08-01 00:45:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Walter 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It sounds like your lumping all middle-eastern countries into one. Israel is not going to attack Saudi Arabia or Kuwait- two of our largest allies in the region. And its "there" not "thier"
P.S. ( Kuwait is a constitutional monarchy, with a freely elected parliment, or a democracy if you will)
2006-08-01 00:48:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by cwido25 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're question is awkwar - "we?"
It's not an issue of "we." There's several political cartoons showing the US as the "world" police and this is wrong - wrong meaning that it's not of our concern. Yes, we should mind the humanitarian issues with the outcome of any war, but "we" should not have any issue with it unless it involves us to such a degree that it may alter our way of life.
From a humanitarian standpoint, yes I think we should be more involved in finding a resolution; but the world didn't do much when invaded Iraq, now did it?
2006-08-01 00:47:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by MJ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It won't solve our energy problem if someone else controls the source. You don't think a capitalist democracy wouldn't capitalize on the oil monopoly? The answer is a different form of energy.
2006-08-01 00:46:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not really a question, but if your asking for an opinion I say politics and religion have no business being one in the same. So I think a lot of these governments who are run by religious figures is completely crazy.
2006-08-01 00:45:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by jprofitt303 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The same way establishing democracy in IRAQ destroying countries?? Killing inocent people in Lebanon?
2006-08-01 02:32:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by justice 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
find an alternative to oil , Get a big pudding bowl , plant it upside down over that area and bug spray the whole festering pit :( its pretty well been toasted environmentally now anyway :(
2006-08-02 23:55:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by asdfgh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋