2006-07-31 17:25:46 · 6 answers · asked by Just Be 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Mmmm...so many people complain about my spell for Iraq...Sorry, my english is not good enough....hehehe...but in my languange, we always write it Irak rather than Iraq....soooo, I wasn't completely wrong, right.... :-)
2006-08-01 04:54:52 · update #1
Its Iraq, not Irak. Its been in the news everyday for the past 5 years. Anyway, yes, he is perfectly able to be in Iraq if he is between 18 and like 65, but he almost definitely isn't in a combat zone or a tough job anyway. They put the younger people in that position.
2006-07-31 17:32:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A soldier who had been discharged in 1996 was sent back to Iraq unknowingly by the military for a year. He didn't complain (I would have) and all he's asking for is active military pay.
He was in his 40's.
2006-08-01 00:31:05 · answer #2 · answered by amg503 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are 50 year old and older in the marines, normally they are no longer in combat but in admin or some other non combat position.
2006-08-01 00:31:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
could be....I know a COL in the Army who is 45-50ish and still goes out on missions with his boys. He isn't the kind to sit back at the FOB (forward operating base)in the A/C on his thumbs.
2006-08-01 00:34:31 · answer #4 · answered by mrsjav 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More importantly, you should learn to spell Iraq.
2006-08-01 00:30:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anastasia Beeverhousen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
50 year olds can be in the corps, however he probly isn't involved in direct combat.
2006-08-01 00:29:11 · answer #6 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋