Better than Hilary Clinton.....
2006-07-31 17:09:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No both individuals would probably incite another Civil War. In fact I am sure they would, if someone didn't pop them during their inauguration first.
2006-07-31 17:16:00 · answer #1 · answered by midnightdealer 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I am not a Hilary fan but I would vote for her over Jackson/Sharton,they are way to close to organized religion and are unstable.
2006-08-01 00:19:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG no way the USA is NOT ready for Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton!
2006-08-01 00:18:08 · answer #3 · answered by jennifersuem 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better than Hillary? That's damning with faint praise.
2006-08-01 00:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by Woody 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah good idea, so the republicans can get 90% of the vote.
2006-08-01 00:28:32 · answer #5 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm, no, then we'd have little Africa with tribes around instead of France. I'd take France over little Africa.
2006-08-01 00:12:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!! Like we need two people who have never had jobs and have only lived off others???? I can't stop laughing.
2006-08-01 00:16:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least they would have a job then.
2006-08-01 00:24:36 · answer #8 · answered by isaac a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
But not by much
2006-08-01 00:18:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
long shot.... in a few more years
2006-08-01 00:12:51 · answer #10 · answered by Richgirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋