I guess you would have to break that question down into two parts - 1. There were no rockets being fired from that village, and the village was randomly attacked. 2. There were rockets fired from that village, and the civilians were caught in the crossfire.
Let me provide my answer first:
1. The Israelis, and anyone for that matter, would be committing murder to target non-combatants. I think that point goes without saying.
2. If there were rockets being fired from that village, than they were justified in attacking those launchers. It is a lose lose scenario - if they attack, civilians will be killed, and those scenes will be played out in the media - a propaganda victory to the terrorists. If they don't attack - they sanction the use of civilians as shields, ensuring their continued use, and ensuring Israel will not be able to defend themselves. They have no choice but to defend themselves, and the blood of civilians is on Hezbollahs heads.
What do you think?
2006-07-31 16:17:45 · 8 answers · asked by Christopher B 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
BlackPride - I can tell you have never been in the military, but watch a lot of movies. I don't care how good you can see at night, or how accurate your bombs are - when you drop a 2000lb bomb on a target, there is going to be collateral damage on and around the target.
So again, the question is - where they justified in the attacks that killed those civilians.
2006-07-31 16:34:04 · update #1
there were rockets being fired from those positions as shown y israeli drones. This justified the attack although the result was horrible. Although israel holds some blame hezbollah was using civilians as human shields so they sohuld shoulder most of the blame.
2006-07-31 16:24:17 · answer #1 · answered by Josh23232323bluejays 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
a million) this is a longtime blockade, interior the regulations of conflict. 2) international regulation states that a rustic can seek, grab or attack a deliver if there is sensible data that it intends to run a blockade. In or out of international waters. 3) there is not any credible legal ruling asserting this blockade is unlawful. 4) the human beings on those ships have been in sparkling breach of blockade, and did in an attempt to assist across the international known terrorist communities. So cut back your senseless ranting and be basic with us. you're pissed with the aid of fact your terrorist friends have not been in a position to kill each final guy, female and new child in Israel such as you opt for for.
2016-11-03 10:29:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
how about the 71 israelis that were murdered in the last 17 months by 12 suicide bomers ? justify that !
2006-07-31 16:24:00 · answer #3 · answered by genny_gump 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Israel bares no blaim on that bombing. They should have dropped 5 more just to make sure.
2006-07-31 16:25:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I support Israel... I hope they kick the living crap out of Hezbollah and scum that support terrorists...
2006-07-31 16:28:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have the night vision technology and super drones to know exactly what and where they are firing at. It's about POWER.
2006-07-31 16:25:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The blood is on Hez's hands
2006-07-31 16:25:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its all propaganda
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/07/milking-it.html
2006-07-31 16:23:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋