My (current) three:
1. Bono (if I could make all 3 Bono just to be sure, I would)
2. Diego Maradonna (but he's about history anyway)
3. Alan Dershowitz (I am on Noam Chomsky's team)
2006-07-31
15:20:21
·
12 answers
·
asked by
party_at_lake_vostok
2
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
Why dont' people just answer the question that was asked ?
1. Any President or VP or whoever, past or present, falls under the heading 'Political or National Leader' - so get over it and come up with somebody (ies) else.
2. Save the moral high ground and religious stuff. There are too many people who try to use this place to 'spread the word' - whatever their word might be. I heard the best term for such people when I was in college, and I still use it: God Botherers.
2006-07-31
16:06:22 ·
update #1
1. Mel Gibson
2. Brad Pitt
3. Barbara Streisand
2006-07-31 15:25:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dave 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
those human beings choose to have better faith in technological understanding.. sure, you need to substitute the genetics in any bacteria and make it 'hunt' particular cells. This even if ought to no longer be a flesh-eating bacteria. we do not recognize the thanks to attempt this in the present day, even if it is going to be conceivable in the subsequent couple of years. we've the skill to create new existence in the present day. meaning we may be able to take chemical substances and synthesize a clean organism with a man made genome. counting on your understanding of DNA it is a great element. this signifies that really ANY organic and organic phenotype (trait or skill) ought to correctly be positioned into yet another organic and organic existence variety. i.e monkeys that glow in the darkish exist. so a techniques as what we are doing with maximum cancers.. between the better promising issues that merely hit human trial is using nanobots. We engineer a nanobot that acts like a perilous disease and has chemical substances (consisting of chemo) that are injected into the most cancers cells it really is somewhat useful. between the coolest things about this except how properly it somewhat works is now maximum cancers sufferers do not ought to be hooked as a lot as an IV for chemo and that is way better accessible all round. this variety of persons did develop a valid aspect and between the the reason why we probable gained't use bacteria to strive against maximum cancers. the actual incontrovertible reality that your body sees maximum cancers as a 'sturdy guy' and fights something attacking the most cancers cells. properly we get round with with the nanobots with suggestions from taking the membrane of a pink blood cellular and putting it over the nanobot. this enables the nanobot to stay alive for 5+ hours the position as if they did no longer have this membrane they could very last perchance 2 minutes.
2016-11-27 05:09:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would I do that?
As what I am wishing today for others, will come back to bite me, one day. As life always give up what we give to it, only generously.
I would rather wish them good luck, peace and well being, when I say in the morning-
May all beings be happy! It not just includes you and me but also all of those 3 people every one has written here.
A prayer always comes around, so does a curse.
Knowing this, what would you do with your list of three people?
2006-07-31 15:45:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Abhishek Joshi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Micheal Jackson,George Clooney, Osama.bin. Laudin
2006-07-31 15:31:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by sumrtanman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 & 2. Bratney Spears and Keven Fenderhead
3. Courtney Love
2006-07-31 15:27:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. People who intentionally promote things that are evil under the guise of good would benefit society if they got flesh eating bacteria.
2. People who intentionally seduce people to not listen to their own sense of right and wrong by saying that some actions are normal and even healthy.
3. People who intentionally degrade the morality of our culture by being a bad influence would benefit society if they got Flesh eating bacteria.
2006-07-31 16:02:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you're a horrible human being for even thinking such a thing let alone posting it here as a question....
I wouldn't wish such a thing to/on anyone for any reason! I pity you and your lineage.
2006-07-31 17:15:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Izen G 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't wish such a horrific disease on any person. That is just creul. Do you know how painful that would be? I don't care if they aren't nice. I still wouldn't even think about wishing that on someone.
2006-07-31 17:06:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by usa_grl15 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
SFO_EXPAT for wishing it on my Beloved Barbara Streisand, you because I agree with Taff that this is a horrible thing to wish on someone, and my Ex, the mother of my daughter, who abandoned her when she was 5 months old.
2006-07-31 15:41:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by rich k 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Michael Jackson oh WAIT! He Already HAS it!
Rapists and Pedophiles but only in ONE particular spot!
2006-07-31 15:42:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Titzen_Ash_23 4
·
0⤊
0⤋