None, they will tell you it's Clinton's fault.
2006-07-31 14:36:57 · 22 answers · asked by Steve R 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why change the lightbulb when you can just buy a whole new house? And bulldoze the old one! And let the debris slide into the nearby river where it can pollute the water and kill the fish, so that the poor schmuck who makes a living fishing downstream won't be able to put food on the table, resulting in his having to take a minimum wage job that doesn't pay enough for him to have even the barest level of health insurance or even enough to take his kid to the doctor, so his little 8 year old girl's illness progresses from something that should have been quite treatable to something more serious, and then to a terrible fatal conclusion, ending a young life that was destined--except for that illness--for great things, including studying international relations and foreign languages and conflict resolution to such an extent that she was going to be a valuable--no, THE most valuable--proponent for world peace in modern times, but in whose absence the nations are unable to overcome their animosity and selfishness and sheer hatred, and who in a final spasm of insanity unleash their pent-up weapons of mass destruction--the real ones, with multiple thermonuclear warheads--and bring the existence of humankind to an instant inferno (for the lucky ones) and to a slow, agonizing death (for the unlucky ones), all because the Republicans were too arrogant to get off their rich butts and change a stinking 60 watt bulb.
2006-07-31 14:51:30 · answer #1 · answered by nosoccertyvm 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, because Clinton was too busy screwing the lightbulb for Republicans to be able to change it.
2006-07-31 14:41:44 · answer #2 · answered by TakingStock 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a silly question. It doesn't take any republicans "NONE" to change a lightbulb. They are all in denial that the light is out anyway.
2006-07-31 14:48:12 · answer #3 · answered by politicallypuzzeled 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but how many Libs will stand around and say what a horrible job the Republican is doing without lifting a finger to help.
2006-07-31 14:40:58 · answer #4 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They can't - the Clintons took all the lightbulbs when they left :-)
2006-07-31 14:40:56 · answer #5 · answered by Nitris 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As I said 6 hours ago to the same question.
The light bulb doesn't need to change. It's happy just the way it is.
2006-07-31 14:50:26 · answer #6 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
4, one to hold the light bulb on top of a stool and 3 more to turn him around to place the bulb.
2006-07-31 14:41:04 · answer #7 · answered by Javy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
about 120 to decide who will be the one who does it. at which point they'll outsource it to someone else, who will then decide again who will do it. then pay that person minimum wage for 6 hours to carefully screw the bulb. at which point then they'll adjourn for vacation and come back 6 months later to decide if it could've been done better.
2006-07-31 14:42:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As many as it takes to make sure it's a bill and gets passed first. So... at least 51 senators.
2006-07-31 14:40:06 · answer #9 · answered by Kats 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The light bulb has never been changed yet so its probably a infinite number.
2006-07-31 14:42:11 · answer #10 · answered by dege3339160 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋