English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

The last change in the Pledge of Allegiance occurred on June 14 (Flag Day), 1954 when President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved adding the words "under God". As he authorized this change he said:

"In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war."

2006-07-31 13:34:54 · answer #1 · answered by Bill 6 · 0 0

The Pledge of Allegiance was written for a contest on Patriotism for a Magazine (I think it was the Boy Scout magazine) in the 1930's. In 1953, Congress made it the official pledge. This was the year that many God references were made standard fare in Government. (as well as 1954)

2006-07-31 13:38:18 · answer #2 · answered by Ananke402 5 · 0 0

My heavens, I certainly not had been flashed, however I did by chance flash a couple of persons as soon as. I used to be within the health facility a while again and determined to take a stoll to the merchandising subject. Well, I wasn't considering what I used to be dressed in and, permit's simply say that the ones health facility robes do not depart plenty to the creativeness at the bottom. The nurse got here up from at the back of me and placed a blanket over my shoulders . . . I used to be thinking about why it used to be somewhat drafty again there!

2016-08-28 14:52:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

By President Eisenhower 1954 ,see details as below :The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has ruled the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional under the First Amendment due to its inclusion of the phrase "under God."

Finding the phrase violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment's separation of church and state guarantee, the court overturned a 1954 Act of Congress that added the words to the Pledge.

The words "under God" were added by Congress in 1954, at the direction of President Eisenhower, who stated at the time, "In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war."

The establishment clause reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..."

In its 2-1 decision, the three-judge panel wrote, "The recitation that ours is a nation 'under God' is not a mere acknowledgement that many Americans believe in a deity. Nor is it merely descriptive of the undeniable historical significance of religion in the founding of the Republic. Rather, the phrase 'one nation under God' in the context of the pledge is normative," the court said in its decision.

"To recite the pledge is not to describe the United States; instead it is to swear allegiance to the values for which the flag stands: unity, indivisibility, liberty, justice and -- since 1954 -- monotheism," the court continued. "A profession that we are a nation 'under God' is identical ... to a profession that we are a nation 'under Jesus,' a nation 'under Vishnu,' a nation 'under Zeus,' or a nation 'under no god.'"

In the lone dissenting opinion, Circuit Judge Ferdinand Fernandez wrote, "My reading of the stelliscript suggests that upon Newdow's theory of our Constitution, accepted by my colleagues today, we will soon find ourselves prohibited from using our album of patriotic songs in many public settings. 'God Bless America' and 'America the Beautiful' will be gone for sure, and while use of the first and second stanzas of the Star Spangled Banner will still be permissible, we will be precluded from straying into the third. And currency beware!"

The original case was filed by the father of a school girl and challenged the right of a school district to require students to recite the Pledge. The case was dismissal by a lower court and appealed to the 9th Circuit.

Today's decision will probably next be appealed to the full nine-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and from there, to the U.S. Supreme Court.

According to an Associated Press report, the ruling -- should it stand -- would prohibit schools in at least the nine Western states under the court's jurisdiction from requiring students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

Congress, President React
Soon after the court's ruling was announced, both members of Congress and the White House denounced the decision.

Of the ruling, Senate Republican leader Trent Lott said, "Either it has got to be overturned en banc by the 9th Circuit or by a higher court or we will do it in the Congress. I think it is essential that this matter be addressed and be addressed quickly."

Lott was joined by Senate Democratic Majority Leader Tom Daschle. "I think we need to send a clear message that the Congress disagrees," he said.

White House spokesman Ari Fliescher, in a brief press conference stated, "The president's reaction was: 'This is ridiculous'. Those were his words."

2006-07-31 14:34:41 · answer #4 · answered by canada2006 5 · 0 0

I think it was Eisenhower. He did it because the Russian were atheists and he wanted to make the American people believe the god was on our side against them.

2006-07-31 13:36:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Eisnhower

2016-03-30 07:30:43 · answer #6 · answered by Jane I 1 · 0 0

The stupid as*hole obviously was too retarded to comprehend "separation of church and state."

Now that B.S. is even more intertwined in government and even more difficult to get rid of.

You wouldn't thank him is it wasn't your religion he added. How does: "Under Allah" sound?

2006-07-31 13:42:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

BH: Nowhere in the Constitution does it say the words 'Separation of Church and State.'

2006-07-31 15:17:15 · answer #8 · answered by NateTrain 3 · 0 0

Abe

2006-07-31 13:35:11 · answer #9 · answered by The Foosaaaah 7 · 0 0

eisenhower did to help stem the threat of 'godless communism'. now we all know that was a completely empty threat but there's your answer.

2006-07-31 13:36:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers