2006-07-31 10:19:03 · 17 answers · asked by osyrusct 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I dont consider myself a conspiracy theorist. saying that i have nothing better to do with my time is hypocritical considering you are here too. If this was a conspiracy plotted by the US against its people then we have a right to know so i say go ahead and have your theories instead of taking mainstreams narrow dogmatic view of what happened decide for yourself. here are some things to think about though.
Osama Bin Laden overnight made himself the single most wanted man on the planet, gave The US a reason to come over and bomb his country his home, his loved ones back to the stone age. and had to go hide in caves. Although people would have you believe that he is a formidable opponent, a dangerous man, a powerful miltary leader it goes down in my books as one of the most boneheaded military startegies ever played.
flip side of the coin? President Bush: Not only did this attack on the WTC's allow them to pass the patriot act (which by the way just the name is propaganda considering there is nothin patriotic about it). allowing the government to invade our private lives all in the name of homeland security. It also allowed The newly elected presidential oil tycoon to take control of some of the richest oil fields on the planet. ask your self how much money is that worth? Would u kill for that kind of money and power? We are talking amounts that our minds cant comprehend. All people who had motives are suspects. Mr Bush had hundreds of billions of motives. To not question this motive and just accept the story fed to us is in my mind ludicrous. So go ahead criticize people for not believing everything the governement spoon feeds us. History has proven that when the US wants something they will take it no matter how many innocent people are sacrificed. So why not look at the person with the most motives?
2006-07-31 11:32:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anarchy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The definition of a conspiracy is two or more involved in the planning of a crime, so yes, 9/11 was a conspiracy. It was not, however, a conspiracy that has the American government involved in it, but rather, a conspiracy of a bunch of people who are sworn to kill us.
As for AC16's comment about no airplane wreckage on the ground? If the plane had been shot down, it would have broken into pieces, but there would be large pieces spread over a wide swath due to falling debris. The fact that there is no wreckage is evidence of a terribly violent crash. What do you think is going to happen to an airplaine that slams into the ground at 450 miles per hour?
2006-07-31 10:30:01 · answer #2 · answered by Rebecca 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conspiracy theorists have nothing better to do. Maybe they think they are being clever and witty or they are showing off their knowledge of a subject. They seem like negative people as well - distrustful in general. But in general, conspiracy theories are bogus. They are overanalyzed for sure. Iif only conspiracy theorists spent as much time and effort trying to figure out why it really happened... maybe we could come up with some real ways to stop terrorism.
And Sept. 11 wasn't a conspiracy. It was a failure of U.S. intelligence - and maybe bad security policies - but it was not a conspiracy.
2006-07-31 10:32:45 · answer #3 · answered by Mike R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was certainly a conspiracy. Twenty or more radical Islamic militants conspired with others in the al Qaeda organization to plot and execute a coordinated attack on innocent non-combatants in New York City and Washington, DC.
More than one person was involved; by definition, that is a conspiracy.
May God bless and keep you and the families of the victims of this tragic act of war.
2006-07-31 10:25:55 · answer #4 · answered by blowry007 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. I was at the Pentagon after the attacks and can definitely say that an aircraft hit the building.
Besides do you really think everyone involved outside of the military can keep any secrets.
2006-07-31 10:29:06 · answer #5 · answered by Albert F 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely
2006-07-31 10:23:22 · answer #6 · answered by tabz_nate 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would help if the F.B.I turn over the video,s of the Pentagon they confiscated from the hotel and gas station........(which they took within 3 minutes of the attack) and gave them to the news media.....a free press is the first sign of a free people
2006-07-31 10:31:09 · answer #7 · answered by tough as hell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i ought to communicate about that regardless of the conspiracy theorists, you aren't any further searching on the melting aspect of metal. metal, actually melts at diverse temperatures counting on the precise compound used. commonly, that is about 1370 stages centigrade, 2500 stages F. yet, to damage the integrity of the metal center ought to easily require a temperature of as low as four hundred stages F. At 1000 stages F, metal losses as a lot as 50% of its skill. Aviation gas burns at about 1500 stages F. so that you do the mathematics. The metal ought to have misplaced better than 0.5 its skill. outcome is the construction collapses. As for WTC7, previously the crumple, fires were burning for better than 7 hours. So, the middle develop into ineffective, merely better weight to deliver the construction down.
2016-11-27 01:46:01 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that there are some interesting websites out there trying to make it one, but I am certain that two planes crashed into the twin towers... about washington I have my doubts. I am not certain who did it but I doubt that it was some group that is in the mountains in afghanistan...
2006-07-31 10:24:17 · answer #9 · answered by Oktimujahida 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a fact. Thermite was found all throughout the samples of ground zero.
people don't wanna believe it so people won't read about it. Thats fine. Head in the ground.
2006-07-31 10:44:27 · answer #10 · answered by DEP 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋