English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ole daddy bush kicked off with gulf war 1 , but junior is coming up on the rails with afghanistan, and lets not forget iraq, and indirectly lebanon,need i say more

2006-07-31 10:11:35 · 6 answers · asked by pat o 2 in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

LIBS SUCK

2006-07-31 10:50:27 · answer #1 · answered by MIKE B 4 · 0 0

I agree. Sr was forced into war because an ally of the US was invaded. But, he did not cause the war. The war in Afghanistan was justified because the Taliban supported people that attacked us; but I believe we were attacked because Jr was elected president, Clinton had their guard up, Bush did not recognize the danger and dropped our guard, AlQuada wanted to settle old scores and took the opportunity. Jr CHOOSE to attack Iraq and made up lies to justify it. So, as to who caused more wars? Sr 0 - Jr 2. The current conflict in Israel/Lebanon is not caused by Jr, but he does support its continuation. So + 1/2. Jr is also doing whatever he can to provoke a war with both Iran and North Korea. So +1? and +1?. Jr's policies have also moved world opinion of the US from envy/resentment to distrust/hate. In terms of world leader, Bush Jr is by far the worst president we have ever had. As far as domestic policy Jr. has no working domestic policy other than "Make the rich richer, make the poor poorer, stick the middle class with the bill."

2006-07-31 17:49:58 · answer #2 · answered by Paul K 6 · 0 0

So you are saying that the Bush presidents are a couple of war mongers? No offense but your thinking seems to be short sighted at the very least. The Islamic radicals. terrorists (if you will) have been at war with us for many years. They say their obligation to Allah is to convert all mankind to their beliefs or kill them. I think 911 and many other instances have shown that they figure they can't convert us so they mean to destroy us and Israel. Israel tried to have Peace with the Palestinians when they tried to trade land for peace. It didn't get them anywhere. And when the palestinians elected Hezballa into power that showed who's side they were on. So it really comes down to them or us. I for one hope that democracy works in Iraq. But I have my doubts. Someone wants said the way you win the hearts and minds of an enemy is when you have them by the balls. You can blame Bush for what ever you want but the war on terror is a serious thing and we didn't start it. We want peace, but we will fight and win this war on terror and yes it will claim many innocient lives that's the nature of the beast. So who do you want to prevail?

2006-07-31 17:42:58 · answer #3 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0 0

You are dumb. Do you expect people to take your question seriously when you don't even punctuate? Even if you did punctuate, your question is a combination of statement and half-assed question. Go watch some more Fahrenheit 911 you braindead/brainwashed idiot. Leave the politics to us educated folk.

2006-07-31 17:17:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if it was a battle of wits they would both lose

2006-07-31 17:15:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

bill clinton

2006-07-31 17:16:42 · answer #6 · answered by rmisbach 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers