English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Invading countries, killing millions, making $ millions from Halliburton... who else agrees that Bush is the new Hitler ?

2006-07-31 09:54:01 · 53 answers · asked by Pres. Chimp 1 in Politics & Government Politics

53 answers

Bush = moderate conservative

Hitler = socialist radical

Where do you get the "killing millions" from? Oh I get it, you're engaging in gross exageration to make a point. Some people call that making **** up.

2006-07-31 10:00:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

QUESTIONS LIKE THESE = SAD REFLECTION OF OUR SOCIETY, who else agrees? It's amazing how easily people can throw around a comparison to Hitler like it doesn't mean something to people. Do you realize just how many were and are still affected by the Holocaust? When you make a connection like this, you practically make light of a serious situation. Bush has not massacred millions of people, Bush does not have negative feelings towards entire races. He does not view a master race, he did not try to forcefully take over the White House and also does not have a secret police who have rounded up millions to exploit and exterminate. Bush is not a power hungry, egotistical leader. Anyone who has done legitimate research and has an actual conversational knowledge on this topic knows that Rumsfeld and Cheney were the masterminds behind the Iraq war and that the motives were not domination and proof of national superiority (like say....Hitler) but a sense of unfinished business on the first Gulf War and that they felt a need to prove America's ability and willpower to strike back against a substantial target (a few Taliban holding out in the caves of Afghanistan don't make headlines). Bush has done plenty wrong in his Presidency, and I would stand to say one of the worst Presidents in our history, although I commend him for going beyond politics at points and trying to make a legitimate change in systems such as education and social security, however shot his proposals were. So please...stop being ridiculous and insensitive to a serious situation and cut this crap out.

2006-07-31 10:13:26 · answer #2 · answered by Jacob C 1 · 0 0

Disagree. Bush is more of a puppet with others pulling the strings. Hitler was a much better public speaker and he had many more people behind him. The are similarities between Nazi political tactics and Bush administration tactics It's Cheney who is making the money form Halliburton and is pulling the strings along with Rumsfeld and Rove. Rove is certainly a latter day Goebbels.

Bush may not be a "dictator" yet, but the administration is doing everything in its power to promote the concept of the "unitary executive" and subvert the constitution to put the president above the law and the other branches of government.

2006-07-31 10:03:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I feel that a much better description of the President is : The Anti-Christ ! He has stated that God told him to invade Iraq. My question to him and his ilk is this : if the US invasion of Iraq was what God actually wanted, why is it taking so long for the Bush Administration's policies for Iraq to be realized?
I would compare Bush more to the Anti-Christ rather than Hitler because Hitler was under no delusion that he was being guided by the Judeo-Cristian God.
I do agree, however, that both false leaders have brought the world to war.
At least Hitler was actually elected into power, unlike Bush, who was placed in office by the Supreme Court.

2006-07-31 10:10:47 · answer #4 · answered by jaybird17762001 4 · 0 0

I do not agree at all! How can you compare Bush to Hitler. Hitler bladantly killed millions of jews. Bush is simply fighting a war on terror. I agree, the invasion of Iraq was a bad idea but he didn't kill millions. It's the terrorist fault for killing their own people and attacking American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan and then hiding among the civilian population. This radical Islamic movement needs to stop!

2006-07-31 10:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by Elite Tinkerer 2 · 0 0

I don't know why I'm going to waste my time typing this out for you - but here it goes anyways.

Comparing President Bush, and yeah - you may not like it, I don't either, to Adolf Hitler is about as un-American as someone can get. It's disrespectful, vile, and completely uncalled for. I don't agree with the man, but that doesn't mean I am going to go around and say he's a man who killed millions of innocent people and used them medical experiments. Not only is than an insult to America, and I pray to God that you're not an American citizen, but it's an insult to all those who died in the Holocaust and who survived.

Get a life.

2006-07-31 10:04:02 · answer #6 · answered by Rio 2 · 0 0

Comparaing anyone to Hitler is dangerous. Even though I am not an advocate for President Bush, I don't think he is anywhere near being the next Hitler. Bush is not a dictator, America is a democrocay. Bush also did not promote any type genocide. You may not agree with President Bush's views, but that does not give you the right to slander him by calling him the next Hitler.

2006-07-31 10:01:44 · answer #7 · answered by PlatinumWeirdo 2 · 2 0

Where do you live Monkey Butt? Iraq? Iran? One of those third world countries? Fact of the matter is, Bush may be stupid, but he is still the President and leader of the country I live in and happen to adore. Loyalty is something I stand by and don't worry, I will not vote for him. I didn't last time either but the other guy, Kerry was just as bad if not worse. I stand behind what I am loyal to and the fact of the matter is, all of you other folks who bash my president and country are just jealous cause you can't call all the shots and be the superpower. Who cares? My little loyal proud American butt knows that I love living here and that no president in this country has ever stooped to the lows of that of Hitler. He was insane from syphyllis!

Show me one president of the United States that is guilty of genocide because he only wanted people with blonde hair and blue eyes to run around in his front yard. Bush may not be the brightest man in the entire world but he is MY PRESIDENT! Most good Americans respect the word LOYALTY! Regardless. We pick everyone up when they fall down and skin their noses. After we kick their butts, of course. Just ask the Japanese if you don't believe me! They had it coming. !!!!! We try to feed them too. Hungry countries actually steal from each other and take the food we deliver away from those who really need it. Remember Somalia?

Don't throw darts at my president. Sure, he is an azzhole, but so is my Dad...and I still love him???? Duh???? Hitler was an imbecile that knew how to throw out a speech to a bunch of really bendable gumbies who fell, hook, line and sinker for his bs! American people are not that stupid. We have a democratic society here and have a say in what goes on. Sure, Bush isn't perfect but he is better than the leaders in all those countries over there. We fought so those people over there would have a chance at a democratic society by giving them the right to vote in the leaders they wanted and guess what they did? They voted in terrorists to run their countriy because they aren't all that bright, obviously. Argue with me if you want but I will defend my president and my country's honor, regardless of what anyone thinks.

2006-07-31 10:19:30 · answer #8 · answered by sherijgriggs 6 · 0 0

Sorry, I can't agree. Adolf Hitler was a great man and a magnificent leader, and mentally, eons ahead of his time . He also served with distinction in the First World War. Bush on the other hand, is an imbecile and a coward of the highest magnitude. I sincerely doubt that he could find his "a s s" with both hands without a road map.

2006-07-31 10:03:21 · answer #9 · answered by Doc Holiday 3 · 1 0

I do not agree. Although I am not an advocate for one way or the other about war. I will say this. Lets not forget about how our country was invaded on september 11th. Don't forget those emotions, don't forget that terrible wrong that cost hundreds of peoples lives. I think George Bush is a man who though quickly and said lets go to war and he's a man of his word and he's doing what he deems best. Let's be real every person is going to screw up no matter who is in the white house someone is going to have a problem with them. I think he is a HUMAN who unfortunately makes mistakes. Just like you and I. I wouldn't be so hard on him. Wouldn't want someone calling out my every inperfection!

2006-07-31 09:59:56 · answer #10 · answered by ashwee23 1 · 1 0

The new Hitler is actually Islamic Fascism. They behead innocent civilians and place there children in harm's way just so they can count their deaths from enemy fire as a victory. You had better watch what you say, coz if you don't the day may come when you may find yourself exilied to a country such as Iran, which is where you belong anyway.

2006-07-31 10:03:39 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers