could we end abortion by offering a 30,000 dollar payment at birth for a child .?

Question

the state then cares for the children an education and then military service .this way we are saving lives and using the saved lives to save even more lives .
this is a win win situation .
MOTHERS of unwanted children get a payment for there suffering and we get a cheap and effective military trained from birth to obey the commander and chief of america .NO longer will the children loved by there parents be needed to defend our way of life.
WE simply take the milion or so un wanted children and raise them to do battle .

does this seem any more bizzar then lets create a permenent under class to raise uneducated kids for battle what we will do is dumb down the educational system get all the wealthy people to work for the government and then recruit the poor by offering them an education there parents can;t afford.

Answer 1

No. The perfect way would be to transfer all unwanted children to the demonstrating pro lifers (womb to womb) and THEY can then bear them and take care of them after they are born.
The real problem with this whole thing is, that all these anti freedom (choice) hicks don't give a damn what happens to these unwanted children once they are born.
I have always felt, that life is tough enough when you are born healthy and into a loving family, that being born into one that didn't want you and just didn't know what to do about it, would be horrible. I for one would chose (if that were possible) NOT to be born into such a situation.
These kids are often abused and start on a path to crime, which society then punishes them for by putting them into the prisons we have to build. And we are already the country with a higher percentage of citizen in our prisons than any other, supposedly civilized, country on the planet.
Based on experience I find that the 'pro lifers' are anything but. They definitely are counter freedom people, which is NOT what this country was created for.
I am NOT for abortion, but I dislike anti personal freedom actions even more. To me human freedom is EVERYTHING. And just talking about it, but acting against it, just will never do it for me.
.
Reading some of the answers nearly leaves me speechless (quite an achievement! ;-))
A lot of these answers would fit perfectly with the old Soviet Union. Is that REALLY what we want this country to turn into? Before that happens, I am leaving and you guys (and gals) are welcome to the cesspool that will be left of this once great country.
Just remember, a people ends up with the government they deserve. What does that say for us?

Answer 2

it is against the philosophy of equality at birth - no one should be born to become "trainees" for battle - this is slavery or some kind of caste system that is to be avoided. And all children need to be loved, just because they were raised by the state doesnt mean they dont need love - however, i do think the state could raise the children and give them a general education and mean while, an overall education of adoption should be given to everyone, so that when there are unprepared parents - the children could be taken over by others who love and want children - there should be some kind of system that treats human beings as human beings with a free will and not as a "service" or "functional" objects.

Answer 3

Children raised in the system are more likely to be problem children. So I wouldn't want to increase the number of children in the system. I mean, it might alleviate abortions but what would keep every woman in that state 14 and up from getting knocked up just to get the money. And to put them to work as soldiers would be like asking your worst enemy to protect you. You would have more people with no allegiance to the country defending it, they would be more harmful than the terrorists. Just because their parents didn't want them doesn't make them worth less than others. Abortion really isn't the worst idea in the world, I mean, where I am from half the people weren't planned and the world would have been better without them.

Answer 4

We could end abortion by just enforcing current law. Current law states that it is illegal to kill a human without just cause. There is no law providing an exception to unborn humans. People assume that since there was a Supreme Court ruling that it is somehow law. A ruling is not a law. Anyone performing an abortion is guilty under the law of murder, but nobody enforces it.

Answer 5

No. First off, some women would not give up their child for money, even if the child's original option was not being born. Secondly, I think that it's pretty much illegal to SELL children. I'm looking in the dictionary and I'm seeing it listed under slavery.

No deal.

Answer 6

Ridiculous

Answer 7

Not every unwanted child would be fit to serve in the military. And, you would not be giving them the basic right of choice that the rest of us citizens have. NO WAY !!!!

Answer 8

I don't know if rewarding them is the right thing to do, it may cause too many to be born. Perhaps if they get to keep the child and raise it. But anyone will tell you 30K is not much nowadays..

Answer 9

I don't know how the government could afford giving 30,000 to the mother AND raising all the babies.

Answer 10

<> basically with the aid of fact something it legal does not propose it is top. <> there's a reason you could no longer spell 'anticipate' with out '***'. people who anticipate too plenty finally end up making asses of themselves. <> does not make experience, does it - and yet, there you're advocating human beings only anticipate the government is sweet! <> incorrect! <> advert hominem assaults harm your credibility. in keeping with possibility Marc, like me, does not see too plenty interior the way of credibility whilst analyzing your question. <> The term "fetus" actually ability "the extra youthful interior the womb". The fetus IS a residing man or woman. life starts off at thought, no longer start nor some arbitrary element in between. hence, each abortion constitutes the homicide of an unborn man or woman. <> however the fetus IS human. hence, abortion IS homicide. <> what's so slender minded approximately acknowledging the unborn for the residing human beings they are? considering you're no longer able to try this, does not that propose your recommendations is in fact extra slender than mine? <> That basically is going to tutor how schizophrenic human institutions could be - and you opt for for to anticipate such a company (the government) is sweet.