How Freemasonry Started
In the ceremonies, Freemasons are told that Freemasonry was in existence when King Solomon built the Temple at Jerusalem and that the masons who built the Temple were organized into Lodges.
Many historians, both Masons and non-Masons, have tried to prove that Freemasonry was a lineal descendant from stone Masons of classical Greece and Rome or from the Egyptian pyramid builders. Other theories reckon that Freemasonry sprang from bands of traveling stonemasons acting by Papal authority to build cathedrals and castles. Others still are convinced that Freemasonry evolved from a band of Crusaders known as 'the Knights Templars' who escaped to Scotland with the Holey Grail after the order was persecuted in Europe.
The honest answers to the questions when, where and why Freemasonry originated are that we simply do not know. Early evidence for Freemasonry is very meager and not enough has yet been discovered - to prove any theory. The general agreement amongst serious Masonic historians and researchers is that Freemasonry has arisen, either directly or indirectly, from the medieval stonemasons (or operative masons) who built great cathedrals and castles.
Those who favor the direct descent from operative masonry say there were three stages to the evolution of Freemasonry. The stonemasons gathered in huts (lodges) to rest and eat. These lodges gradually became not the hut but the grouping together of stonemasons to regulate their craft. In time, and in common with other trades, they developed initiation ceremonies for new apprentices.
We know that in the early 1600s these operative lodges began to admit men who had no connection with the trade - accepted or 'gentlemen' masons. Why this was done and what form of ceremony was used is not known. As the 1600s drew to a close more and more gentlemen began to join the lodges, gradually taking them over and turning them into lodges of free and accepted or speculative masons, no longer having any connection with the stonemasons' craft.
This theory is based on evidence from Scotland. There is ample evidence of Scottish operative lodges, geographically defined units with the backing of statute law to control what was termed 'the mason trade'. There is also plenty of evidence that these lodges began to admit gentlemen and former "Knights Templars" as accepted masons. Medieval building records have references to mason's lodges in 1400s.
Yet it is in England that the first evidence of a lodge completely made up of non-operative masons is found. Elias Ashmole, the Antiquary and Founder of the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, records in his diary for 1646 that he was made a Free Mason in a lodge held for that purpose at his father-in-law's house in Warrington. He records who was present, all of whom have been researched and have been found to have no connection with operative masonry. English evidence through the 1600s points to Freemasonry existing apart from any actual or supposed organization of operative stonemasons.
This total lack of evidence for the existence of operative Lodges but evidence of 'accepted' masons has led to the theory of an indirect link between operative stonemasonry and Freemasonry. Those who support the indirect link argue that Freemasonry was brought into being by a group of men in the late 1500s or early 1600s. This was a period of great religious and political turmoil and intolerance. Men were unable to meet together without differences of political and religious opinion leading to arguments. Families were split by opposing views and the English civil war of 1642-6 was the ultimate outcome. Those who support the indirect link believe that the originators of Freemasonry were men who wished to promote tolerance and build a better world in which men of differing opinions could peacefully co-exist and work together for the betterment of mankind. In the custom of their times they used allegory and symbolism to pass on their ideas.
As their central idea was one of building a better society they borrowed their forms and symbols from the operative builders' craft and took their central allegory from the Bible, the common source book known to all, in which the only building described in any detail is King Solomon's Temple. Stonemasons' tools also provided them with a multiplicity of emblems to illustrate the principles they were putting forward.
A newer theory places the origin of Freemasonry within a charitable framework. In the 1600s there was no welfare state, anyone falling ill or becoming disabled had to rely on friends and the Poor Law for support. In the 1600s many trades had what have become known as box clubs. These grew out of the convivial gatherings of members of a particular trade during meetings of which all present would put money into a communal box, knowing that if they fell on hard times they could apply for relief from the box. From surviving evidence these box clubs are known to have begun to admit members not of their trade and to have had many of the characteristics of early Masonic lodges. They met in taverns, had simple initiation ceremonies and pass-words and practiced charity on a local scale. Perhaps Freemasonry had its origins in just such a box club for operative masons.
Although it is not yet possible to say when, why or where Freemasonry originated it is known where and when "organized" Freemasonry began. On 24 June 1717 four London lodges came together at the Goose and Gridiron Ale House in St Paul's Churchyard, formed themselves into a Grand Lodge and elected a Grand Master (Anthony Sayer) and Grand Wardens.
For the first few years the Grand Lodge was simply an annual feast at which the Grand Master and Wardens were elected, but in 1721 other meetings began to be held and the Grand Lodge began to be a regulatory body. By 1730 it had more than one hundred lodges under its control (including one in Spain and one in India), had published a Book of Constitutions, began to operate a central charity fund, and had attracted a wide spectrum of society into its lodges.
In 1751 a rival Grand Lodge appeared, made up of Freemasons of mainly Irish extraction who had been unable to join lodges in London. Its founders claimed that the original Grand Lodge had departed from the established customs of the Craft and that they intended practicing Freemasonry 'according to the Old Institutions'. Confusingly they called themselves the Grand Lodge of Ancients and dubbed their senior rival 'Moderns'. The two rivals existed side by side, both at home and abroad, for 63 years, neither regarding the other as regular or each other's members as regularly made Freemasons. Attempts at a union of the two rivals began in the late 1790s but it was not until 1809 that negotiating committees were set up. They moved slowly and it was not until His Royal Highness Augustus Frederick, Duke of Sussex became Grand Master of the Premier Grand Lodge and his brother, His Royal Highness Edward, Duke of Kent, became Grand Master of the Ancients Grand Lodge, both in 1813, that serious steps were taken.
In little more than six weeks the two brothers had formulated and gained agreement to the Articles of Union between the two Grand Lodges and arranged the great ceremony by which the United Grand Lodge of England came into being on 27 December 1813.
The formation of the premier Grand Lodge in 1717 had been followed, around 1725, by the Grand Lodge of Ireland and, in 1736, the Grand Lodge of Scotland. These three Grand Lodges, together with Antients Grand Lodge, did much to spread Freemasonry throughout the world, to the extent that all regular Grand Lodges throughout the world, whatever the immediate means of their formation, ultimately trace their origins back to one, or a combination, of the Grand Lodges within the British Isles.
Freemasonry is one of the world's oldest fraternal organizations. The lessons Freemasonry teaches in its ceremonies, are to do with moral values. Freemasonry's acknowledgement, without crossing the boundaries of religion, is that everything depends on the providence of God. Freemasons feel that these lessons apply as much today as they did when it took its modern form at the turn of the 17th century.
Despite what many people claim, Freemasonry is not in any way a secret society. Freemasonry's so-called secrets are solely used as a ceremonial way of demonstrating that one is a Freemason. In any case, Freemasonry has been exposed by the media for almost as long as they have existed. The real point of a Freemason promising not to reveal their secrets is basically a dramatic way of promising to keep one's word in general.
Other reasons why Freemasonry cannot be called a secret society are that Freemasons do not promise to keep their membership a secret. Where and when Freemasons meet are matters of public record.
It is ironic that Freemasons used to be quiet about their membership. They were and still are taught never to use it to advance their own interests. Critics have taken this the wrong way and think that there is something secretive and nasty because of the silence. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Masonic ceremonies are secular morality plays, which are learned by heart, by members of the lodge for the benefit of the person who is becoming a Freemason. Each ceremony has a message for the candidate. A further reason why Freemasons do not go around broadcasting their contents is simply because it would spoil it for the candidate. The same way you would not tell someone the ending of a good book or a film, you would not tell someone about the ceremony.
Freemasons are required to profess and continue in a belief in a Supreme Being. Their ceremonies include prayers, which are not in any way a substitute for religion. It has no theological doctrines, it offers no sacraments, and it does not claim to lead to salvation. By having prayers at its meetings Freemasonry is no more in competition with religion than, say, having a meal where grace is said.
Freemasons are not allowed to discuss religion or politics at meetings. Freemasonry's aim is to encourage its members to discover what people from all different backgrounds have in common. As is all too well known, debate about religion and politics can lead to heated discussion rather than enlightenment.
A Freemason is thus basically encouraged to do his duty first to his God, and then to his family and those who dependent on him. He is to help his neighbors through charity and service.
None of these ideas is exclusive to Freemasonry, but all should be universally acceptable and Freemasons are expected to follow them.
2006-07-31 09:14:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Littlebigdog 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Freemasonry started with the cathedral builders and stonemasons in Europe in the Middle Ages. Once an apprentice became a Master Mason, he was given secret words and handshakes so others could recognize him as a Master Mason.
He was called a "Free" Mason, since they had no boss or owner, and also had to be free men, not slaves to join.
At present it is a fraternal society, focused on keeping ancient rituals, which look like historical plays, and also supporting community events and charities etc.
No, it doesn't have anything to do with "the devil", since this is a Christian concept, and Masons can come from all religions and backgrounds.. the only requirement being a belief in some God, over 18 years, and a free man.
If you need any other info ask ;-)
2006-08-01 08:10:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Haha, no, the Masons are not associated with the devil. Masons are an organization or men all over the world that are all theists (so any religion that believes is a God). They used to be a very secretive organization that protected a number of secrets that to date, are still well kept. They identify themselves to one another using a secret handshake that you wouldn't notice without being one yourself. The French have a brach that is Atheistic, and I believe they are generally not accepted by the rest of the Masons. The Masons are all about mutual assistance and bettering their societies. You will find that a lot of people in high places have been invited to and become part of the Free Masons.
There's been some stories about them in recent Dan Brown novels but a lot of that is nonsense, so don't take the Da Vinci Code as a point of reference.
I believe there is a similar organization for women that has not been around as long (think back to before Jesus was born).
2006-07-31 16:03:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by largegrasseatingmonster 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a fraternal organization, sort of like a guild that workers belonged to in the Middle Ages. Freemasons have some secret rituals that are connected with the actual trade of masons, like brick layers. However, they also have a lot of spiritual and philosophical tenets that you have to agree to if you want to be a member. Roman Catholics, for example, aren't supposed to belong because of this.
It's not that big a deal--mostly it's an insider's game that men use to make social and business connections. It's been around for years--there's a museum in Massachusetts all about them. Mozart was a freemason, and several of our presidents have been.
2006-07-31 16:03:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by homebuyer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a man who does engraving on stone for nothing.
No, seriously, it is a semi-secret society, with rituals, handshakes, signals and phrases that looks after its members. It has a good side(s) in that if a member of a Lodge (the meeting house) dies, the other members pay a nominated amount each to the widow. It is mostly for men, but there are sometimes 'women's sections'. It used to be forbidden for Catholics to be a member, but that ban was lifted about twenty years ago. An interesting fact is that if you ask a Mason a direct question 'Are you a Freemason' he is duty bound to answer you 'Yes' if indeed he is. He will take many evasive routes to avoid answering the question by trying to change the subject, but if you insist, he must admit...............
2006-07-31 16:03:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by thomasrobinsonantonio 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a very old fraternal organization that only requires two things -- a belief in one god, and in a human soul. Most Masons are Christians, but the requirements allow for Jews, Muslims, etc. to join. The only purposes of the organization are to enjoy fellowship, build character, and contribute to charities and the community. There is much false BS about the Masons, however.
2006-07-31 16:01:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by gtk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's not a bad thing at all. In fact, they meet in a temple setting. They have organized meetings and chairs. While what they speak of is secret, they do good deeds.
My dad is a free mason.
The shriners are involved with the free masons. They do good stuff.
2006-07-31 15:59:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mama R 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
a very old secret society of men, they started out as brick masons who started the society, several of our presidents were freemasons.
2006-07-31 16:00:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by rhino_man420 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
dang im 11 and i know who they were. they were rebels in the late 1700's and early 1800's
2006-07-31 15:58:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by legendaryfrog 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are a group of people that do concrete and bricklaying "free" of charge.
2006-07-31 16:00:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
google "define: freemason"
2006-07-31 15:58:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by tjslove 3
·
0⤊
0⤋