Insane maybe
2006-07-31 08:05:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dont be fooled into thinking a little love and some roses are what we need here. You cant put a bandaid on a gunshot wound. Your ideas about love and humanity spreading are great though and I celebrate your sentiments. IF we as the most powerful nation on the globe could give one world peace offering to the muslim world it would be to withdraw support and the free pass of violence that we give to Israel, who for a long time has mooched much of its power from us. Im there with the love thing though. Keep on talking about this!!!!! YOu live in a magnificent time of change, and your voice is here for a reason.
2006-07-31 08:12:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by prancingmonkey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no you are not a liberal you are a flower child wanna be!
Most liberals i know don't want to ignore the threats of radical islam. they just would have focused more on afganistan and finding bin laden, rather than invading iraq, a nation that has been held in check since the first gulf war with no fly zones, sanctions, U.N. inspectors etc. liberals would not base their military focus on securing big oil industry interests and would focus more on trying to stabilize the middle east rather than the destabilation that has been taking place without any real answers or end in sight!
2006-07-31 08:23:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by guppy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
SPAMing us to get us to visual demonstrate unit a action picture. rather GOPish of you, in case you inquire from me. Farenheit 9/11 became a actual action picture. basically with the aid of fact it proves the Republicans full of it, does not make it unfactual. Sane human beings have confidence that when ideals and actuality conflict, the perception is faulty. Republicans have confidence in any different case. And in basic terms on your innovations, Liberals understood the threat of Islamic terrorists until now interior the Clinton administration whilst Clinton submitted proposals to Congress to shelter usa from terrorists. i think that it became Trent Lott who called terrorism, "a phoney situation". of direction on 9/12, the Repugs unexpectedly thought that the Clinton proposals have been a good suggestion. If the Repugs had taken terrorism heavily in the previous 9/11 might probable no longer have surpassed off. of direction we nonetheless might have invaded Iraq.
2016-11-03 09:39:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by bucknor 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone wants to get a long but such a thing is impossible. There are too many conflicting view points.
2006-07-31 08:03:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by bumpocooper 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
its a wonderful dream ..ignore those asshol**..and it would be possible if humans were more than the hairless chimp brain chemical puppets that they are//hte problem is that money and sex is more important than enlightenment../.and whats funny is they create this illusion of god and heaven to try to convince themselves that they are good..then act out on it. liek kids playing house...what a joke.
2006-07-31 08:16:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You sound like a young, weak minded republican who is very bad at sarcasm. Why instead of attacking noble principles ....defend them....before they are all gone. think outside the "FOX"
2006-07-31 08:13:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by tough as hell 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
More like delusional.
But then again, most liberals are delusional, so yes.
2006-07-31 08:04:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Impeach Bush !!
2006-07-31 08:02:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're unrealstic.
So yes, you're liberal.
2006-07-31 08:03:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by schillinfl2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋