I know the answer.
If he was standing in the same spot and I cut off you teacher's leg he would have lost ten pounds and the equivilant mass.
However if he was in a rocket moving at a constant speed away from the earth he could rise to an altitude where the gravitational attraction between him and the earth was 10 lbs less but he would have lost no mass.
2006-07-31 07:23:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nick N 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Your mass and weight would both be 190 lbs (assuming you were still on planet earth).
Mass is a measurement of matter. Weight is determined by gravitational pull. Walking around on Earth, these are pretty much the same because the Earth's graviation pull is (pretty much) the same wherever you.
If you went to the moon, however, you would weight less. But there wouldn't be less of you--you'd still be made up of the same amount of matter. This is the difference between weight and mass.
So assuming a constant gravitational pull, you'll lose the same mass as weight.
2006-07-31 07:33:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spot! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No you would not have the same mass unless you cheated and found a place with low gravity (parabolic plane dive).. You could get your weight to zero then but you would still have the same mass!
Don't confuse weight and mass, although they both change by 10lbs in your case. You teacher is absolutely wrong. This assumes you lost the weight by dieting and measured your weight in the same way
2006-07-31 08:53:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by andyoptic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on how you lose the weight. If you lose the weight because the force of gravity is reduced, then your mass can stay the same. Otherwise (gravity being equal), the reduction in mass and weight must be proportional.
Remember, f=ma. In this case force (weight) can be reduced by either reducing the mass (m) or reducing the gravity (acceleration).
2006-07-31 07:25:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joe Rockhead 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Assuming you are in the same gravitational field
(that is, you didn't lose weight because you went
to moon) then you would NOT have the same mass.
Weight (which is a measurement of a force) = mass * g
where g is the gravitational acceleration. If g doesn't
change and weight does, then mass must.
2006-07-31 07:44:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by PoohP 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your teacher either was in error or he miscommunicated. In fact, "weight loss" due to loss of body fat is, indeed, mass loss. He may be confusing this issue with "weight loss" due to gravity reduction, which has no impact upon mass. If gravity remains constant, a reduction in weight is necessarily a reduction in mass.
One way of asking this differently is: what does "weight loss" mean, concretely? For most people who, for example, eat a more healthful diet & exercise more, and then over a 10 week period lose 10 pounds, what has happened? What has happened is that increased metabolic activity combined with reduced calorie consumption has caused the body to metabolize stored fat to meet energy needs. This stored fat is then converted through the metabolic process into heat energy to power cells and metabolite by-products of that process; the excess mass has absolutely left the body through normal elimination (e.g., urination, perspiration, defecation, etc.).
What he may have meant is that non-weight-impacting body shape reconfiguration (in other words, turning fat to muscle with a visible change in one's waistline but no net change to weight) is of course not a change in mass. Or he may have been thinking about gravitic changes. But otherwise, he was wrong, and you were right.
2006-07-31 07:28:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by snowbaal 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
if u start a diet regime and r losing weight the proper way, the fat burns and redistributes itself 2 where its needed.
after about a month or 2 of dieting ur body reaches a plateau and u start losing inches (mass) instead of pounds.
thats y alot of people give up their routine becuz they think the diet is failing. ur body does need fat and also the "good" cholesterol.
2006-07-31 07:28:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by RIKNAMB4EVR 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
definitely your mass at 190 lbs is less than the mass at 200lbs.but how mush mass you last is depend upon what mass you last from your body ie.,whether you lost the water or fat etc.
2006-07-31 07:32:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by MAAL.G.P P 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. your weight is your mass times the acceleration due to gravity. If your weight decreases, and gravity remains constant, then your mass decreased.
2006-07-31 07:29:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by mr.quark 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
if we are talking about body mass index then your mass would unequivacally be different.
2006-07-31 07:27:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋