English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

OK best 9 out of 10 wins. Is that a more fare game.

Don't get me wrong. I am as anti Clinton as anyone on Earth. I despised the fact that the Multinational Agra Corporations, chose him when he was only 8 years old. Like building a Manchurian Canidate He went to expensive science camps, did all the right field trips, did meet and greets with top government officials from the age of 10. He was the top student in highschool top of his class in college. 1 of only 2 selected for a Rhodes Scholorship. Has a IQ over 180. He is a manipulated man.

Yet the majority of the blues think he was a nice man with a zipper problem.

Redpublicans cronies are pointing their finger "saying god hates b,j's" All the time Big Business is laughing all the way to the bank. Companies like ADM are planting canola oil crops all over the earth paid for by American redevelopment funds. And the
Americans eat these indigestable oil products that kill you.

Supersize it Red Bill

Go big Red Go

2006-07-31 06:47:14 · 21 answers · asked by 43 5 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

Playing Chess Bush would win...playing Chest (or with chests) Clinton would win...


"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski"

2006-07-31 06:53:25 · answer #1 · answered by DAVER 4 · 0 1

Drugs kickin' in,eh?

Clinton would win.Bush can't even play chess,much less any real and dangerous foreign affair stategy games.

Or in Bush's case,"stateregy".

Where do you think those indigestible food products come from.Republicans who make money at the expense of peoples lives.Duh!

I'll say it again:
Better to have a Clinton in the White House with a balanced budget getting serviced by a real woman than to have a Bush in the White House with a $400B deficit on his knees for a false god.

Now get back to summer school.
GO Big Big Blue Go!

2006-07-31 13:54:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Clinton is an example of a person who is "academically" smart, but a fool outside of the academic environment. Just ask Hillary. He can, however, express himself very well and he can be charming.

Bush is an example of someone who has been educated at the best schools, but has a disconnect in applying what he has learned. He has difficulty expressing himself, but his sincerity appeals to many people.

I don't know who would win at chess. Depends on skill level at that game. I don't think winning or losing would say much about either.

2006-07-31 13:59:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Depends. If Bush played as white, he would proboably loose. However, as Black requires a bit of delfection tactics, and requires patience for people to underestimate its position, I would say Bush could pull out a win.

I see Bush playing a variant on queens indian if he had to play black, as it is a subtle opening that requires white to overplay their position.

If Bush played white, I see a traditional scotch game, or maybe a more daring russian opening. Either one, however, I think would have him blunder.

Clinton is way too cautious, but way to obvious. An englsih opening would secure the center boar as white, but leave his end game weak to a concentrated pawn attack. Clinton as black would play a tradition reciprication ploy, then vart with a rushed queen attack.

I see clinton winning 3 of 5, depending on the strategies they each adopt. Hope this helps.

2006-07-31 14:00:48 · answer #4 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0 0

Clinton because Bush wouldn't even finish the game. He would be to drunk and would probable pass out after the first game.

However if Bush is snorting cocaine like he used to he might last a few games. But he would still lose in the end, when he accidentally puts checkmate on himself.

2006-07-31 14:06:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

With all those credentials you would think Bill Clinton could figure out how to keep his zipper up wouldn't you? Personally, I'm a supporter of President Bush in all things.

2006-07-31 13:57:48 · answer #6 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0 0

Chess is a game of skill and common sense, two of which Clinton has none of. Having an IQ of 180 means you are good at trivia questions, not leadership.

2006-07-31 14:01:59 · answer #7 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0 0

Clinton over bush, no doubt. Cuz bush is like a hobbit on weed. He couldn't even find his iPod because it was already on him. Also he was trying to look for weapons of mass destruction inside the White House.

2006-07-31 13:54:59 · answer #8 · answered by Nemrac rocks 1 · 0 0

Bush would win, because Clinton would be distracted by some whore giving him head under the table while they played.

Love, Jack

2006-07-31 14:03:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush? Playing chess??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Clinton, playing chess with GWB????

Never. In a million years.

Clinton is a genius.

Bush is a ~ well, he ain't a genius.

He probably can't even play checkers!!

You knew the answer to this question before you asked, of court.

2006-07-31 13:56:30 · answer #10 · answered by dragonheart 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers