This question is only with your opinion. I just want to see the majority's answer to this question. I want to know if you think that it was Ben Roethlisberger's fault because he went when he shouldnt have or if it was the lady's fault for going when she shouldnt have or any other opinions that you have.
2006-07-31 06:46:27 · 11 answers · asked by Heidi 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
The accident was the woman's fault, and she was cited for the accident. When I first heard about it, I told a friend of mine, "It's the darn Pittsburgh left"!, and it was. She turned left in front of him after the left arrow (her signal) had turned red, while he still had a green light to continue through the intersection.
2006-07-31 08:01:32 · answer #1 · answered by stlrgrl86 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The lady turned in front of him. He is not an idiot for not wearing a helmet it isn't against the law. Doctors said that if he was wearing a helmet his head would have been heavier and could have went through the windsheild and the cuts could have killed him. That isn't a reason not to wear a helmet but there is a reason for everything and I believe that is the reason he didn't have a helmet on. And yes he did have a motorcycle license just not a PA motorcycle license.
2006-07-31 07:38:30 · answer #2 · answered by Ducky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was not at fault. The driver of the car failed to yeild at the intersection. But Ben was charged with not having a motorcycle liscense and also he did not a a helmet on either which in PA its the law to were a helmet for you learning permit and your first two years of riding a motorcycle.
2006-07-31 06:53:23 · answer #3 · answered by hunter 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Without actually seeing the scene, I'll go out on a limb and fault the guy who rear-ended you, Fail to Control Speed.
2016-03-27 09:04:26 · answer #4 · answered by Debra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She was at fault for the accident. But he was at fault for his injuries. Not wearing a helmet and riding a motercycle when his contract said he was not supposed to.
2006-07-31 06:53:10 · answer #5 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both of their faults. The lady hit him but he wouldn't have had so much injury if he had a helmet on.
2006-07-31 06:49:51 · answer #6 · answered by christigmc 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first off for the "ohhhhh ya gotta wear a helmet"...boo hoo...its not illegal ..in pitts...so...whatever....so what...what ya want a wimp for a qb...??...anyway..its the LADYS FAULT...ever notice the others who have crashed were from their OWN fault...hitting objects trees...or riding late night after a rain...BEN KEEP DOING YA THANG....ps....GOOOOOOOOO NINERS....
2006-07-31 09:45:00 · answer #7 · answered by ninerfaninsanjose 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The lady because she turned in front of him. She was issued a citation.
2006-07-31 06:49:56 · answer #8 · answered by drinkupmehearties 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was under contract not to ride a motorcycle
2006-07-31 06:49:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
technically both....
but the bastard should have died... he's the biggest dumbass in the NFL..
"I still plan on riding my bike any time i feel like it, even if my coaches don't agree with my decisions, it's still my choice." "No No, i still don't plan on wearing a helmet while riding"
DUMB
***
2006-07-31 17:50:51 · answer #10 · answered by squad9_7 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋