English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Many Sergeants and others are willing to talk about this. Out of 18 bradleys, 3 are in working order,and out of those 3 one was tested by a Sergeant that has passed many target practices, and his Brandley didn't hit ONE TARGET,but was passed at 100%. Col.J.B.Burton tells the Deparment of Defence that his Charlie co. 126 is qualified.Your'e suppose to have 75% working, they have 31%.The equipment is in the same shape as it was FEB.2005.Even Sniper Sergeant Calson is worried. All the new soliders were trained to shoot at only 350mil, when it's suppose to be 800. Charlie co. does not feel that the new soliders are ready for Iraq or any War.Sergeant Fielder went out in the field with his 12 guys in FEB.&MARCH 06 and out of those 2 mos. they went about 45 days not being productive. We are suppose to keep up the solides morale, but they need more than letters & care packages. They NEED protection& good working equipment. They are fighting a WAR,& should be #1, no matter what the cost.

2006-07-31 06:12:24 · 5 answers · asked by john 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

5 answers

This situation is shameful AND on the other hand you have many in the US that say funding the war is a crime too.

This is the other side of the support for the war. Sometimes when you don't support the war you end up not supporting the soldiers as well. That may be why the media outlets aren't investigating. The armor was a story early in the war, but now they've dropped it.

2006-08-08 01:28:51 · answer #1 · answered by Ken C. 6 · 0 0

Have you contacted any media outlets regarding this situation? It sounds like a story for 60 Minutes. I would also get in touch with the Washington Post.

2006-07-31 10:37:27 · answer #2 · answered by M B 2 · 0 0

Nothing qualifies a soldier to be a soldier like getting shot at...

Anyone, even vets who have every toy the government issues is still worried if they have a brain that works...

Sounds more like Charlie company has a problem with higher & higher...

2006-08-01 10:36:22 · answer #3 · answered by juandos 3 · 1 0

i think of Sri Vidya Rajgopalan has given the main remarkable answer. however the respond is very long. enable me clarify you in short. Ram outfitted a Bridge instead of deliver with the aid of fact he thought, if interior the conflict with Ravana extra military of Varana is needed then it will be common to deliver reinforcement via a Bridge Than to deliver deliver.

2016-11-03 09:27:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

i do not answar this guestion but i want your the search about the auto cad
best regars
mustafa

2006-08-08 00:29:53 · answer #5 · answered by km_nab_ban 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers