No plane debris at the pentagon?

Question

why was there no plane debris at all found at the pentagon? Why don't we see the surveillance video of the surrounding hotels and gas stations after it was confiscated? Why did the owner of the WTC towers take out terrorist specific insurance weeks before the attacks? Why did a steel structure collapse into pieces when it is proven this couldnt have happened by fire alone? Please, don't answer until you've researched this first. I will not accept uneducated answers.

Hey, i don't pretend to be the person who knows the truth. I don't even want to be known as someone who is versed in these things at all. I JUST WANT PEOPLE TO LOOK, AND EDUCATE YOURSELVES. DO NOT RELY ON THE TELEVISION OR THE NEWSPAPER, THEY ARE THE MOST BIASED MEDIA AVAILABLE. DAMN SURE DONT RELY ON ME, JUST DO THE RESEARCH YOURSELVES. STOP DEMONIZING THOSE OF US WHO ARE TRYING TO GET AMERICANS OFF THEIR APETHETIC ASSES, HELP. IF YOU KNOW THE TRUTH, SHARE IT. IF YOU HEARD A NEWS BROADCASTER OR COLUMNIST FOR A NEWSPAPER TELL YOU SOMETHING, SCREW THEM. WE HAV ALL HEARD THE SAME DAMNED THINGS, GO WHERE BIG BUSINESS DOESN'T HAVE ITS GRUBBY HANDS, INDEPENDANT INTERNET JOURNALISM. ITS THE LAST SAFE HAVEN FOR FREE SPEECH AND UNBIASED INFORMATION!

Answer 1

Why don't you research it yourself me conspiracy theory. Do you think it's all a huge cover up by the oil companies to create a war so they can raise prices so the commander in chief and his cronies can make record profits off of the death, destruction and desecration of the American people. It' out of your control. Let it go. There is absolutely nothing to be gained from such knowledge and everything to lose. You might as well be asking for the missing notes in the Warren report relating to the assassination of JFK.

Answer 2

They show pictures of planes that have crashed before, and show debris all over the place and burn marks. That is what happens when planes hit the ground. Now look look at the second plane that hit the WTC and see a relatively small hole in the side of the building where it hit. After the first plane hit and video first came out of the burning hole, most people thought is was a small plane that hit because the hole was small. The plane that hit the Pentagon hit the building directly. It would have left marks on the ground and scattered debris if it had hit the ground first.

Answer 3

Where the hell were you on 9/11? Did you miss the rescue workers digging through the debris for the survivors. The plane wreckage was everywhere! The vid from a gas station was on the news 10 minutes later. Get a grip and stop reading the Arab conspiracy sites.
Did you miss the building experts on TV that explained just exactly how and why the WTC collapsed? It was on TV 20 times, on the discovery channel.

ARE YOU AN ARAB MAKING BS MISLEADING STATEMENTS!

Answer 4

You may not accept uneducated answers, but we can still get points by answering it anyway!

The World Trade Centers didn't collapse because of fire, they collapsed from the impact. The towers collapsed downwards. When the planes crashed into the towers the top of the towers was torn away from the building on impact. It took awhile, but soon the bottom collapsed under the top half's weight (if this isn't true, well then it's just what I heard).

Answer 5

there is... it is just in small parts so we find it unsatisfying.

the twin towers surpassed their design specifications. it has not "been proven" that it could not happen through fire alone. please show me what you are looking at, because i have not seen anything prove that. i have researched that a LOT. hollow structures generally fall into their own footprint even when they are not demolished. and there was enough fire and destruction for the top section to collapse the ones underneath it when it failed.

someguy, you claim the people who question the conspiracy theories are doing so out of a knee jerk reaction... but i can't find any of this "evidence" you list unless i invent it myself. that first claim in particular is practically meaningless. how is it evidence?

http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm

ps... i read your additional details and i know you mean well BUT take some responsibility for your own opinions. if everyone comes back and says, "you seem to be nuts", maybe you should consider the feedback? how much have you looked at these websites? i am completely prepared to duke it out with you... but don't blame me if you come to the fight unarmed! i'm not zoning out with the mainstream media and i think the conspiracy sites are mostly crap. got any evidence you're really convinced of? let's have it or you just go look at it in your closet like a good porn addict...

Answer 6

This is my response to another question you posted, but I want to post it again because I want as many people as possible to read it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've recently taken hold of the conspiracy theory since doing some research of my own. Sad thing is, it's a knee-jerk reaction by some people to discredit the theory just because of the preconceived notion that all conspiracy theorists are nuts and can never be believed - I know because I was one of those people at one point. It's really tough to do people, but I emplore you to do some unbiased, reality-check thinking and really explore the evidence that is out there. Play devil's advocate with yourself and see what it's like believing the other side - you'll find it's a lot tougher to discredit yourself than you would've thought.

There's just way too much evidence on this one:

- The terrorist-specific insurance that Larry Silverstein, lease owner of the WTC, placed on the buildings weeks before the attacks.

- The way the buildings collapsed - first buildings ever to fall because of a fire.

- The fact that, despite knowing planes were hijacked, we didn't deploy fighter jets to follow them unitl 75(!) minutes later - by the way, presidential approval is only needed for shooting down hijacked planes, not deploying jets to follow them.

- Bush told the CIA to back off investigations on Bin Ladin's brother.

- Bin Ladin recieved medical care in the US when he was supposedly a wanted man.

- Put options on both American and United Airlines were through the roof leading up to the attacks (for those who don't know, put options are basically bets that the stock will go down in the future).

- No evidence of a plane crashing at the Pentagon...none whatsoever.

- Video tapes from a nearby gas station and hotel showing what happened at the Pentagon are not being released.

- Bin Ladin confession tape is fabricated. He is writing with his right hand and he's left handed (or the other way around...either way, wrong hand), and he's wearing a gold ring, which he wouldn't be wearing for religous reasons.

- By the way, anyone else find it strange that we don't hear ANYTHING about progress on finding Bin Ladin? We got Saddam. We aren't even trying to get Bin Ladin...supposedly he is hiding in Pakistan or Afghanistan or somewhere...but we really aren't putting a full fledged effort to flood those areas with troops and find Bin Ladin. If he's such a threat, why not do everything in our power to find him instead of spending all of our effots in Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11? Oh yeah, the Bin Ladin's and Bush's have had a history of being friendly to one another. Check the relationship Bush's grandfather had with one of Bin Ladin's direct ancestors.

Put the pieces of this puzzle together and they fit better than any fairy tale you've ever read.

There is so much more evidence I could write for days. People, there IS evidence. Tons of it. Enough with the "I just saw Elvis, too!" lines and actually put your brain to the test. What I can't believe is that the writing is all on the wall, and people are in DENIAL. To those who do understand what went on, keep getting the word out. People need to understand how the government is absolutely taking advantage of the situation (Patriot Act, anyone?...oil anyone?...complete undermining of basic constitutional rights anyone?)

What a sad state we are in.

Answer 7

Steel bends in high heat. The weight of the material attached to the steel caging forces the steel to fold inward. When this happens, the effects of gravity take hold and floors fall onto floors boosting the momentum thus putting unimaginable pressure on the steel caging. The end result is a collapsed tower.

Answer 8

I've seen that documentary, too. Then I've seen other articles contradicting that. It definitely is odd that there is no surveilance footage showing a clear view of an actual plane, that we only get to see the nose, or what appears to be a nose. If it's a conspiracy, I'm still on the fence about that one. I guess I believe it could be possible but I'm still holding onto the hope that our own government wouldn't stoop that low. It was a horrible tragedy any way you look at it. People died.

Answer 9

Maybe because it wasn't hit by a plane...They said that they need the videos for investigation and they only released a few frames that show a white thing heading towards the Pentagon.It didn't convinced me that it was a plane...
The steel starts melting at a temperature of 6000 Celsius degrees...The fire caused by kerosene could reach temperatures at about 10000 Celsius degrees...So it could have been this the cause of the collapse of the towers...

Answer 10

Apparently you haven't seen the playback video of the crash on the Pentagon. The cameras weren't set up to monitor across the street, they are preset and some are pantel zoom, the ones I viewed apparently were preset. It was from a gatehouse and in the frames you see the plane enter into view, the next frame shows the crash. CCTV views in live time, the recording though is done in timed frames.