It must have been for cash.
First of all the the chars: the Crockett side..... wasnt bad
Tubbs was WAY OFF... no jamaican accent.
The story line got so damn twisted i got lost after 30 min
DOnt know if there was any opening credits. It shows the movie company logo then jumps into something happening at a night club. Never even tells us what movie were watching. I fell asleep at least 20 times hoping it would get better.
2006-07-31 05:35:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by clomtancy 5
·
11⤊
1⤋
Wow. Are you serious? A movie based on a HORRIBLE show from the 80s sucked? Oh my. I never would've guessed. Especially with 2 heavyweight actors like Farrell and Foxx. I mean those two combined have made nothing but blockbuster movies over and over. How could the movie possibly suck.
Only an idiot would waste their money watching that movie. An even bigger one would use Foxx as a reason why the movie should've been good.
2006-07-31 12:37:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by jdscorrupted 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well that all depends if are old enough to have seen the television show Miami Vice when it was a hit on friday night prime time back in the 80's. Most people who see movies that were once television shows when they were younger have a "comparison" factor worked into it. I believe that as far as nastalgia goes, it makes a big difference wether your going to like it or not.
2006-07-31 12:38:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by bros.parker 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's proof that motion pictures based upon former successful television series do not necessarily guarantee box office returns. Unlike the television series of the same name, this movie dwells too much on the dark, violent side of life, rather than on the rational, logical methods of detective work. It certainly doesn't take a detective to find out that Hollywood needs to come up with some original stories once again, rather than relying on successes of the past and then bombing at the box office.
2006-07-31 12:39:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The critics liked it, but they panned POTC2 and it did well. Vice did greta for its first weekend, but we will see if it has staying power.
I loved Vice on TV and the critics blasted that, so I am thinking the new one is all dark and different. It seems to me they should have just changed the names since it is so different from the show. It would be as if the guys who made the Wihmaster movies called it I Dream Of Jeannie!@
2006-07-31 12:31:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by But why is the rum always gone? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked it. I admit the first time listening to them talk it was difficult to understand but the action was good and the toys were good the boat, the plain and the guns were very awesome, it was a guys movie but the way it was filmed was so different then any movie I have seen it put you in the action like you were being shot at.
2006-07-31 12:40:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by shrnstum 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It sucked really bad, it was a horribe movie, Bad Boys was way better than Miami Vice. Plus some parts weren't even filmed in Miami, theyw ere filmed in south america.
2006-07-31 12:30:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i saw it on saturday too. don't worry, you're not alone. everyone at our showing said it sucked.
(there were only 30 people in the theater (probably 200+ seating) for the 7:00 show on saturday - and that's a generous estimate. i live in a town where the only things to do are go to a movie and go bowling. i think that says a lot.)
2006-07-31 12:33:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jersey 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Colin Farrel makes "stinky" movies..Jamie Foxx is an EXCELLENT ACTOR...If Jamie Foxx had a better acting partner in that Movie...I guarantee it would have been better...I havent seen the Movie...but as you can tell with my answer...anything that Colin Farrel stars in is always a LOUSY MOVIE
2006-07-31 12:30:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by celine8388 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Enough of the public saw it to have it outduke "Pirates" for weekend BO Totals
2006-07-31 12:31:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋