He should be, because his talent level outclasses Man U, and because I don't believe it is safe for him to play in England. Drunken British hooligans will without a doubt never let the World Cup die. England lost, fair and square.
2006-08-03 12:06:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by tesorotx 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Considering the fall out between Ferguson and Van Nistelrooy apparently centered around Ronaldo and Van Nistelrooy has now gone, Fergie can't let Ronaldo go now. But if he feels the same way in a year or two, then he will.
2006-07-31 05:31:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by prinsin99 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe a number of your element yet not of their entirety. there's a substantial distinction interior the way their respective communities enable the two Messi and Ronaldo to play. At Barcelona Messi is their sole poacher. The effectiveness of Messi because of the fact the 'fake 9' decreases the striker's tally whilst increasing Messi's.The strikers become correct as possibility creators.Barcelona relies upon heavily on Messi because it quite is the plan. His place provides him as lots attacking liberty as he needs and it quite works. Now, at Madrid,the main poachers are Benzema and Higuain. in reality NO supervisor interior the international makes a team revolving a winger. In unbalanced attack a great deal.in case you verify out Tottenham, Bale is in simple terms an excellent participant,yet he developed from the type,not any other way around,likewise at Madrid. Benzema's and Higuain's ineffectiveness places stress on Ronaldo to become the main poacher. in actuality, he dislikes being a striker as stated in his guy U days and time-honored RMA season. making him play striker takes removed from his type. actually, the if Madrid buys a international class striker like Cavani then the stress would be off Ronaldo and everybody will then see that the team is geared up around his stardom,yet not around his soccer.
2016-12-11 03:40:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cristiano Ronaldo had signed a contract with Manchester United the previous season which ends until 2010.. and he should honour it, as the club says.
2006-07-31 05:30:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by LιLу 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
he said he dreamt of going to real madrid but he's ok with man u. besides he will be on the bench in real madrid. its good he stayed in man u. man u and ronaldo all the way.
2006-08-01 16:47:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by stan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ronaldo is staying put. He is not going to Madrid.
2006-07-31 06:09:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I don't want to see any one hurt and u know at Man United's first game he'll get booed so I think he should have left I doubt he still has fans there
2006-07-31 09:20:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tina G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I don't want that rapist playing for Real Madrid. I hope those english fans beat the hell out of him!
2006-07-31 05:56:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by socasoccer@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
he should leave..fans will boo him if he continues to play in england..but it's hard to leave bcos he signed a new contract with man u before the world cup started..and his mom wants him to stay too..
2006-07-31 06:16:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by salmon_ella 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think cris should be allowed to leave! but its not fair they force him to stay i am only scared for his saftey.
2006-07-31 06:09:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by jazzgizzle 3
·
1⤊
0⤋