2006-07-31 04:06:42 · 15 answers · asked by derek4u 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
and he would tell you in syria
2006-07-31 04:08:54 · answer #1 · answered by mason x 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which president? President Clinton additionally claimed that Iraq had chemical weapons and supported terrorists. you may what vp Al Gore's speech claiming that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and supported terrorists. The UN reported that if the U.S. hadn't invaded, Iraq might have had a nuclear bomb in 2010 it quite is that this year. Even Saddam's generals nevertheless Iraq had weapons of mass destruction up till he troops began to roll in the time of the 2d invasion and Saddam suggested they did not have any. i does not say the intelligence grew to become into incorrect. i might say that Iraq went to super lengths to make human beings have faith Iraq has weapons of mass destruction as much as Israel has not denied it has nuclear weapons (so now human beings now have faith that Israel has nuclear weapons). the militia has created an lots as they are able to for a great soldier. the subsequent step could be ideas analyzing it is so a techniques impossible.
2016-12-11 03:38:10 · answer #2 · answered by kosakowski 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe we are still debating this. There was probably no weapons of mass destruction, but if there was we will never know. First because arab leaders always lie. Second because President Bush will never admit there weren't any. We would have gone into Iraq even if there weren't even suspicions about WMD's. It was our destiny, we had to finish the job, plus that's all the arabs wanted to see a weakened United States. So I believe we should get over this issue, do what we have to do and get out of there as soon as possible. And for the fallen soldiers: Thank you for your sacrifice...
2006-07-31 04:21:33 · answer #3 · answered by Great Master TK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I bought into it. I was behind Bush in the beginning, but seeing as I call things like I see them, I wouldn't be able to face myself if I were with him now. There comes a time when pride is set aside and what is right is acnowledged. Some of the people in the right wing just can't admit that Bush was wrong and that scares me. Yes I was for Bush and if I am completly honest with myself- Bush was wrong.
Where are the weapons of mass destruction? They're in Israel!
2006-07-31 04:21:16 · answer #4 · answered by profile image 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question, since we know the USA, Russia, former Soviet-block countries, China, France, and Germany, et. al. gave most of these Chemical, Biological, Nerve-agents, weapons and weaponry (Now referred to as Weapons of Mass Destruction.) to Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Jordon, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, Syria, Israel, et al. Nuclear components have been rumored to have been sold illegally by many of these nations illegally for about twenty years now....
"Leogirl0804," pretty much poked a hole in your question too! So ask "Billy-Boy from Arkansas'" if he lied to Bush and the rest of us....Or was he too busy with "Monica-the-mouth?"
Your question should be where are they now!? They have never been accounted for........The only thing proven was that no one has found them yet.....Sleep easy tonight liberal-chimp!
2006-07-31 04:16:50 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reasons for attacking Iraq have changed many times, ranging from WMD's to 9/11 to Saddam is an "evildoer". Saddam wasn't a good dude indeed but there are many more that exist around the world.......he was probably the least dangerous.
2006-07-31 04:11:13 · answer #6 · answered by carpediem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're a couple years late on this topic, don't ya think? And while he didn't find WMD's, look at what he did find: Mass Graves, finally giving ammunition to put away a crazy dictator, he's also making it harder for the terrorists to plan, finance and execute their plans...etc...And..."ahem", you would have preferred WHO to be the president right now? Al Gore, John Kerry? Can you imagine any of those handling these situations?
2006-07-31 04:15:36 · answer #7 · answered by KnA 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get over it. You lost. You're a looser.
We would be in Badgag even if there was no weapons.
Saddam blew up New York and now we are punishing Iraq by forcing them to be Democrats. We will get all the oil for our SUV's and they will die in the sand.
Go big Red Go
2006-07-31 04:14:48 · answer #8 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He will now say it is in Iran. Does have the courage to attack Iran to find the WMD.
I think Iranis will see that he is sent back without pants.
2006-07-31 04:11:40 · answer #9 · answered by Electric 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He will produce false evidence to prove they did exist. Mission accomplished!
2006-07-31 04:11:22 · answer #10 · answered by murraystate69 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They've been in North Korea all along.
He just forgot.
2006-07-31 04:15:09 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋