he is back to bashing journalists. i guess its easier to blame and point fingers at the press like a baby then take responsibility for a failed administration. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060730/ap_on_el_ge/rove;_ylt=AsTNLR.ZTg1Gs4sJLxIkBdZp24cA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
2006-07-31 03:25:53 · 7 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No doubt about it. If Bush is in any way like Hitler, old Karl is the reincarnation of Goebbels, the minister of propaganda.
Blaming journalists for the criminal excesses and horrendous failures of the Bush administration is like blaming Hurricane Katrina on the cameras that filmed it.
2006-07-31 03:36:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, and it is our job to lap up everything that the media is trying to sell us, just as if it were mother's milk... we need to believe every single tidbit as if it were the Gospel truth...
It's easier to be a liberal and just nod your head and not do any criticial thinking and just hate everything about this country and assume that everything this administration is doing is wrong and corrupt. Yahoo News would never post anything that wasn't the absolute truth, and why bother checking on it? It's the same old liberal laziness - it's easier to blame and point fingers at the Bush administration than to get off your lazy butt and try to do anything positive. Liberals would much rather curse the darkness (darkness that they create in their own minds every day with their obsessive negativism - kind of a social depressive disorder - oh yeah, I just defined liberalism again...) than to do anything that might light some candles...
2006-07-31 10:40:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Karl is just the rottweiler for Bush
2006-07-31 10:28:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he's the Chief Strategist. It's just that issuing shifty attacks is one of his pet strategies, since it's one of the most effective.
2006-07-31 10:30:46 · answer #4 · answered by kreevich 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just think of him as Bush's James Carville.
2006-07-31 10:28:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.The "man" has no conscience and no soul.His whole life is one big reactionary vendetta against "liberal" society.
2006-07-31 10:30:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he's the president, dude.
2006-07-31 10:28:28 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋