they lost alot this offseason, willie mcginest.
2006-07-31 03:15:39 · 8 answers · asked by MikeAwesome 4 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
but they do get Rodney Harrison back, and they have weak divisional opponents. They're still a top 10 defense (I have them ranked #6 for fantasy purposes).
That said, if someone will offer you a position player for a DST, then take it if it helps you out. You can always pick up a defense.
Very often, I will do that week-to-week. Just see who is playing the 49ers or Texans and grab them if they're available.
2006-07-31 06:41:26 · answer #1 · answered by mikep426 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt you could trade for a better D straight up which emans you would have to give up something else in order to upgrade. I dont think the Pats D will be too bad this yr so you may want to sit tight.
www.fantasyfanbase.com
2006-07-31 03:53:33 · answer #2 · answered by fanbase 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
easily.. that is a WASH... it is all decision. Palmer is larger, yet Tom is an striking QB and extremely last 12 months without each and each and every of the proficient WR, he develop into waiting to do ok. Tom now has the WR and weapon to be better or as sturdy as Palmer. Patiots Def is sturdy. Packers DEF is a sleeper.
2016-11-27 01:10:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If u can upgrade without hurting any other position yes but they are going to be good enough not to trade if it means putting up somebody good in return.
2006-07-31 03:45:37 · answer #4 · answered by whviper0055 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as i told u in your last Question keep them they still got lot of people they won't miss willie a bit on the field.
2006-07-31 06:16:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they will still fair pretty well, There are better out there, but they are a decent starting team!
2006-07-31 03:19:02 · answer #6 · answered by Scott M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes that player is irreplaceable. go with baltimore or pittsburgh defense.
2006-07-31 03:23:06 · answer #7 · answered by answer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definitly, i thounght it sucked last year..
2006-07-31 03:19:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋