I'm an extreme liberal, and I agree with you.
99% of Hollywood are hypocrites UNDER control os Jewish producers. They cannot stand for themselves because it invervenes with the people that give them jobs.
I take my hat off for Charles Chaplin, who despite his boss' demands that he didn't speak against Hitler, he did anyway. If only a few more people were like this in Hollywood...
2006-07-31 03:11:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kookoo Bananas 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Right-wing Hollywood bashers must be having a difficult time, too. Since the beginning of the War on Terrorism, they have been accusing Liberals in general of being secretly in favor of Arab radicalism. Now they will be disappointed when celebrities fail to decry the suffering of the Lebanese people as their theory would indicate. But it's interesting how the Right is totally cavalier about the loss of innocent civilian life when it comes to the Lebanese. It's an acceptable price to pay for their religious sentimentality over Israel, who apparently can do no wrong.
2006-07-31 03:18:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by kreevich 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can think of equally deserving humanitarian efforts in Africa, India, Asia, and even the USA! Why suddenly does everyone get upset when Lebanese civilians get hurt and killed in war!? Where is the outcry over the "Muslim slave traders," that are alive and well in Northeast Africa (Niger, Chad, Libya, etc.)? Or the genocide in that same region (Somalia, Rwanda, etc.?)
I recall these same people danced in the streets on 9/11!
What did Hollywood have to say about that!? They blamed the US as usual.....I really don't care what they have to say. Most are under-educated in Hollywood anyway.
2006-07-31 03:23:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Conservatives love to underscore hypocrisy among the upper echelon of Hollywood. Of course they never seem to see the hypocrisy in their own camp. After all, where are all the self-professed loving Christian conservatives during the humanitarian crisis that is occurring in Darfur or in the Sudan? It seems that it is far easier to lambaste those who destroy life in their wombs because it doesn’t hurt ones pocket book, but when you see a wholesale slaughter of life in other countries, pro-life ideology doesn’t seem all that important because one would have to actually pull out your pocket book to help. Where are the conservative voices of outrage, after 9/11, when it was found out that most of the hijackers had Saudi links, and yet this administration put very little pressure on the Saudi government? I guess the strong patriotism that conservatives boast about is muted when it comes to critiquing their business partners. Where are all the conservative pro-life advocates, when thousands of children are dieing due to the destruction of Iraqi infrastructure (i.e. hospitals, schools, and sanitation), devastation that was caused by our military actions. I guess pro-life doesn’t apply to foreign life. Where are all the hawkish right-wingers when North Korea makes brazen threats on our security? Ahhh…there is no need to call for military action against a country that has no ample supply of crude oil. Hypocrisy abounds on all sides, with right wing hypocrisy having far graver moral consequences.
“Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but don't consider the beam that is in your own eye?” (Matthew 7:3)
2006-07-31 03:52:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lawrence Louis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Focising on 9/11 a little late hollywood time seems to be at least three years behind the rest of America
2006-07-31 03:23:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dr. Feel Good 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question does not reflect reality.
Their voices are being shut out by right-wing-dominated news programs, or mocked by people like you who have no answers besides making juvenile insults at people whom you do not like.
Like most sane people, US citizens who work in the entertainment industry want the fighting to stop on both sides.
Where are the voices of the US politicians who actually control foreign policy and world affairs? They are all taking a wait-and-see attitude while lives are destroyed. But your types don't care, because you will never have the guts to get on the battlefield.
People who don't want war should protest against it. People who want it should fight it, not just sit at their keyboards making cowardly verbal jabs at boogeymen.
2006-07-31 03:25:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by John P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gee ya think they are finally figuring it out that getting involved in politics is a career dissipater? I have a long list that I wouldn't walk across my side walk to see let alone give them a nickle of my money.
2006-07-31 03:13:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If someone such as Hezbollah were to start lobing rocks into
your house how long would you stand for it after they killed your family. Wouldn't have the heart to fight back after burying your dead. If you did that to me I wouldn't care much for you.
2006-07-31 03:18:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Zoner 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hollywood is where it's alway been.
Just northwest of downtown Los Angeles.
2006-07-31 03:24:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The the two want peace. The Palestinians want their land decrease back. Israel is in charge in my view. end consequence ought to be that the arab international rises up and wipes out Israel. Israel would desire to have run out of Prozac.
2016-10-01 07:20:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by mehan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋