Is the price been paid by war better done by talks around a table in the middle east?

Answer 1

Indeed, talks around the table are always better. But in the middle east, where treachery and back hand politics are common, talks are not worth much. The Oslo accords signed between Israel and Yasser Arafat have helped Arafat secure a teritorial base from which he could launch attacks into Israel. Known as the second Intifada, these attacks triggered the bloodshed that has been going on in Israel and the Palestinian authority the past 6 years.
The bad news is that the Hezbolla, acting from Lebanon, do not have any real issue with Israel. Being Iran's proxy, they actually use Israel as a pretext to increase Iran's presence in Lebanon, thus making them the dominant force in Lebanese politics. Unlike the palestinians, they have nothing to gain by negotiations and therefore we will not see them at talks with Israel.

Answer 2

It's unnecessary seem at Sudan and Dufar as soon as in which there have been Christians now slaughtered they're 70% Muslim what's the factor of releasing those individuals who vow to kill each and every Christian on the planet? Why is Bush releasing them?

Answer 3

You can't negotiate with those who have sworn to your destruction.... example: Hamas has written in their charter that Israel must be destroyed and they will not recognize their right to exist...
Iran has stated that the US and Israel must be wiped off of the map...

you have to FIGHT Islamic fascism! they will not negotiate!

Answer 4

One cannot trust any agreement made with the HezBULLie scorpions. Read below.

Answer 5

If it could work we'd do it, but these people are arragant jerks and the only thing they understand is our bombs. I wish they would listen, but they keep forcing our hand.

Answer 6

it sure is. too bad muslim terrorists would rather kill civilians and establish their bases among civilian populations.