keneth blackwell republican liteunant governor who throw out thousands of democrat votes in ohio was chairman of bush-cheney campaign in ohio. conflict of interest?
2006-07-31 02:53:51 · 8 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
bluejacket-i dont live in ohio but i hope strickland wins!
2006-07-31 03:16:25 · update #1
He also holds stock in Diebold, the election machine makers. He is shady all the way around, however the mindless idiots in this State will vote him in as GOV.
2006-07-31 02:55:53 · answer #1 · answered by theheronhouse@sbcglobal.net 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yup...that's why I voted as a Republican in the primaries this past May. Blackwell is running for Governor this fall and I wanted to try my best to stop him from even gaining the Republican nod, but it didn't work. He is going up against the Democratic candidate, Mr. Ted Strickland, an ordained Methodist minister from southern Ohio. The latest polls had Strickland ahead by a considerable margin (something around 70% to 30%). I don't have the exact numbers at the time, but the word is that the Republican party of Ohio is not fully sold on Blackwell. Right now, we need an honest man to take over this state and bring it out of the funk Taft got us in. Ted Strickland is that man. My family knows him (they are from his district) and he cares about the little man. Strickland for Governor!
2006-07-31 03:09:07 · answer #2 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Blackwell is a clown. I'm voting for the person who:
1) Brings some blue collar jobs to this state
2) Raises the speed limit and/or eliminates the split speed limit for trucks
3) Isn't in the pocket of every special interest group out there.
Oh wait........I think the heat has affected my brain. Sorry.
2006-07-31 15:30:42 · answer #3 · answered by Kat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals are still trying to re-write history - they talk about this issue, but not about the 7 states where democrat criminality resulted in their winning those states' electoral votes. It's typical, they only look at one side of every issue - it's like the networks... The networks only work one side of the street, only know one side of the story, and then want everyone to believe that is the ONLY side of the story...
Iowa, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Oregon - were just a few of the states that had concrete legal shenanigans taking place in both 2000 and 2004 elections, but you will never hear about them from the liberals or the networks - they just endlessly prattle on about Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004 - both of which were investigated endlessly and democrats lost them fair and square... the just never get tired of rehashing their losses. They can't and won't look forward, because they have no vision, so they keep looking backward, trying to revise history...
2006-07-31 03:14:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no count if or no longer they opt to be approached, or left on my own is many times the version between approachable and not approachable. all and multiple ought to be approached in a hypothetical issue, no longer all situations are hypothetical nonetheless. maximum folk %. up on while somebody desires to be left on my own, and while they sense like drawing close human beings, they many times enable human beings recognize via drawing close human beings.
2016-12-14 16:47:27 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That doesn't surprise me any more that the election fraud perpetrated by Harris in Florida in 2000.
2006-07-31 02:56:19 · answer #6 · answered by ceprn 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nobody likes a whiner.
2006-07-31 02:55:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes
2006-07-31 02:54:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋