Super Powers have to act like the parent other wise they have to spank the bad countries
2006-07-31 01:31:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by lost&confused 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pax Americana, 1994. Make a google search, and you can see the plan.
You'll see Dick Cheney among others in that great resolution.
Among the guidelines, controlling the main world resources. As for internal affairs, establishing power links of financing and lobbies which assure elections.
It's working god damn well, it seems.
Let's say, America still works under cold war frames. So they keep bases in several countries in which they shouldn't, and propaganda politics work at maximum level. You have no idea how much crap americans swallow through tv
Rome fell. The Otoman empire fell. ambition seems to doom. I hope America doesn't fall, and that American citizens regain the true power in the politics of their own country.
But now it seems we really need international balance of forces instead of a superpower controlling. When i was 9 years old, i thought America's rule alone was good. I've changed my mind completelly.
My area is politics, and im deeply sad about what's happening and what might happen if the domino keeps going.
2006-07-31 01:44:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dear misguided friend, Here's a list of the countries the US doesn't want to control:
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola Antigua & Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
B Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Botswana Brazil
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma (Myanmar)
Burundi
C Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Congo, Democratic Republic of the Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
D Denmark
Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic
E Ecuador
East Timor
Egypt El Salvador
England
Equatorial Guinea Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
F Fiji Finland France
G Gabon
Gambia, The
Georgia
Germany Ghana
Great Britain
Greece
Grenada Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
H Haiti Honduras Hungary
I Iceland
India
Indonesia Iran
Iraq
Ireland Israel
Italy
J Jamaica Japan Jordan
K Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati Korea, North
Korea, South Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
L Laos
Latvia
Lebanon Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
M Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
N Namibia
Nauru
Nepal The Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua Niger
Nigeria
Norway
O Oman
P Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian State*
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru The Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Q Qatar
R Romania Russia Rwanda
S St. Kitts & Nevis
St. Lucia
St. Vincent & The Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
São Tomé & PrÃncipe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
T Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand Togo
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
U Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
V Vanuatu
Vatican City (Holy See) Venezuela Vietnam
W Western Sahara*
Y Yemen
Z Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe
2006-07-31 01:31:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by jamie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dave B is being rude.
Dude, we don't. Bush has gone nuts after 9/11. When he and Chaney are out of office on January 2009, everything will begin to settle down. We all have to suffer with this until then. Just keep wait until then.
Wish I could tell you more, but I can only repeat we do not want to control the whole world.
2006-07-31 01:36:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually we would prefer to be left alone. We need no more land, and our economy is doing just fine. It is all of the others that are causing all this grief. We aren't starving and murdering people in Africa, We are lobbing rockets into neither Israel or Lebanon, we and most every other country in the world is trying to rid the world of terrorist. So I do not understand your question. Perhaps if you could site a few intelligent examples, we could answer your question.
2006-07-31 01:32:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because we pretty much do. It's not that we want to, because we don't, but there's no other country that has the means. If we don't chaos ensues--the world's a pretty turbulent place now, I agree, but without someone there to hold the rudder, the present state of affairs would seem almost idyllic by comparison; and as I said, there is no one else.
2006-07-31 05:01:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by nacmanpriscasellers 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because America always takes the side of the good guys instead of the criminals.
e.g. Israel over Hezbollah, south Korea over North Korea.
God Bless George Bush!!!
2006-07-31 01:33:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by bill w 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because America is a doctor and other countries have psychological problems. America is just trying to rehabilitate this countries.
2006-07-31 01:58:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by kunjaldp 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush thinks indeed that he is the leader of the world, its better to let him dream and don't wake him up.
He lost completely and make a fool of himself in Russia, he should stay away from real intelligent people, I wonder if he knows it by now?
2006-07-31 01:31:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chri R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is the secret world,hidden you do not see but you can feel it ,the changing happened is the suffocated plan ,conspiracy which you can not understand if you do not commit your self finding it's roots.READ the dollar face ,your president is one of this secret group working together to achieve their proposal,or if he is not be sure they are working to change him.America is the boss but BUSH not the boss.time is coming if u ,ll have long live u ,ll see and believe but they are under god vision.
al selwiy
2006-07-31 01:43:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by amyryam21 1
·
0⤊
0⤋