2006-07-30 22:07:38 · 10 answers · asked by Ahab 5 in Business & Finance ➔ Corporations
No,Its better they have a Queen
2006-07-30 22:11:02 · answer #1 · answered by Ryna Fonda 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We will soon - just as soon as Dick Cheney orders the next "terrorist" attack in October 2008, the elections will be suspended and George Dubya the First will remain president until succeeded by his brothers and then his daughters.
2006-07-31 05:11:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WE ALREADY HAVE ONE: KING BUSH IV "THE TERRIBLE"
....And Harry is right: Quote: "George Dubya the Fourth will remain president until succeeded by his brothers and then his daughters."
2006-07-31 14:02:18 · answer #3 · answered by Brandon ツ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm my own king, King Kurt!
2006-07-31 05:42:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When I was a little girl, Elvis died. My next door neighbor told me the King died. I told her, "We have a president in the US." Your question reminded me of that! :)
2006-07-31 05:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by curiositycat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like being able to elect our leaders -- look at how messed up the British royal family is. I think that if our leaders misbehave we should be able to boot them.
2006-07-31 05:10:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The concept of "royal blood" baffles me.
2006-08-01 12:58:44 · answer #7 · answered by B F 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
people eat and go potty the same way.
americans don't bow, as part of their culture.
2006-07-31 05:11:41 · answer #8 · answered by john john 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because it is a waste of money
2006-07-31 05:10:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they would be wiser.
2006-07-31 07:35:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋