English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bombing a country with aerial bombs when you know that country has no air force?

OR

You do not have an adequate military so instead of just giving up, you choose to fight back the only way you can, with militias/insurgents much like we did during the American Revolution when we could not beat the British head to head on the battle field?

Which one is the coward?

2006-07-30 21:39:15 · 11 answers · asked by BeachBum 7 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

the usa are no1 cowards!! they invade tiny countries who cannot defend theirselves!!! you wont find them taking on russia,china,korea etc....

2006-07-30 23:13:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The Israeli GOVERNMENT is wrong for launiching this assault that has apparently hurt more civilians than it has members of Hezbollah, and Hezbollah is wrong to target innocent Israelis in their anti-Israeli(government) attacks.

No matter how you slice it, ALL WARFARE is evil, and the best way to deal with it is through diplomacy. So I have to say that the cowards are those that can kill innocent people and not take the time to express true remorse for it.

Cowards are on both sides of this conflict.

2006-07-31 05:46:42 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel C 2 · 0 0

Cluuuuuuuue - lesssssss.
Airstrikes are required to knock out mobile rocket launchers.
How are you going to have foot soldiers attack a launch site that is positioned and relocated in 15 minutes.
I think the Israeli's have shown that they are one of the fiercest fighting forces in the world.
It's called tactics and air superiority.

2006-07-31 08:03:48 · answer #3 · answered by Munster 4 · 0 0

R U Joking??? What kind of question is this ???
U forgot that they don't have either naval force...

For me the real cowards are UN, US, and europe who don't take the situation under control as they suppose to do so!!!!

2006-07-31 04:46:09 · answer #4 · answered by Louis 3 · 0 0

No one is a coward when it comes to war. Like the first answerer said, another man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

2006-07-31 04:58:58 · answer #5 · answered by Miss LaStrange 5 · 0 0

Cowards, are people that can't sit around a table with their enemys and talk.

2006-07-31 05:02:01 · answer #6 · answered by J W 2 · 0 0

Keep a track on this link everyday for the updates



http://fromisrael2lebanon.info/

2006-07-31 04:51:37 · answer #7 · answered by RAMO 1 · 0 0

I agree with the answer of Louis.

2006-07-31 06:57:43 · answer #8 · answered by Lutfor 3 · 0 0

My, we have quite the precocious one here tonight, don't we??? Chew on this, sister... One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Not so nice 'n tidy now, is it???

2006-07-31 04:44:41 · answer #9 · answered by Sean T 5 · 0 0

I say its the one who wrote this question

2006-07-31 20:36:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers