English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

. If the terrorists want to fight can't they come out into the open? wussy carbombs and Al Jazzeara can't win YOUR crusade!Work on indoor plumbing THEN world domination

2006-07-30 21:31:26 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Would you not say bombing a country with aerial bombs when that country has no air force is cowardly?

Yep stupid cowards...

What are they thinking....

Just like when we used militia to beat the British during the American Revolution... darn us cowards that knew we couldnt take the British head to head on the battle field...

2006-07-30 21:36:25 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1 0

if YOU were fighting an enemy you knew you couldn't beat head to head, and you were determined to win, would you fight them head-to-head? If you couldn't beat someone in a straightup fight, but you know in your heart you are right and they are wrong, would you roll over and just take what's coming, or would you fight for what you know is right with any means at your disposal? This is what we are up against.

Maybe some people would fight head to head against a vastly superior opponent, like the polish cavalry charging the german tanks in sept 1939. That style of fighting isn't very effective though.

2006-07-30 21:50:11 · answer #2 · answered by 006 6 · 0 0

they're not cowards, they're just smart. they know that they would have no chance in hell if the stood in the open with a sign saying terrorist. its tactics, hiding in crowds, carbombs etc. smart little buggers arent they. maybe instead of fighting terrorists we should find out what we are doing to make them hate us in the first place

2006-07-30 21:37:11 · answer #3 · answered by swimmer dude 3 · 0 0

"Military historians classify suicide bombing as a form of armed violence, belonging to the tactics of asymmetric warfare—suicide bombings are only common when one side in a violent conflict lacks the means for effective, conventional attacks. The cost-benefit analysis, expressed here by Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, is simple: "The method of martyrdom operation [is] the most successful way of inflicting damage against the opponent and the least costly to the mujahidin in terms of casualties".[2"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_bombing

2006-07-30 21:58:22 · answer #4 · answered by Mohammed R 4 · 0 0

Do the freedom fighters have the same kinds of arms as the Zionists? Can they fight in a convetional manner under conventional rules? Of course not. They have an inherent disadvantage, and they work their way around it.

2006-07-30 21:46:03 · answer #5 · answered by Walter 5 · 0 0

for people who bypass bombing human beings and killing harmless toddlers ec it extremely is unquestionably incorrect, in the event that they opt to combat, combat with people who're oppressing the Muslims, the place they are extremely mandatory. it extremely is fairly complicated to describe why one would fall into this seize and do what they do, some try this by using fact they sense they are helpless i.e can no longer do lots to assist with the injustice that Muslims are dealing with subsequently they undertake this stupid decision killing harmless human beings. i'm via no capability attempting to justified what they do, yet you should steer faraway from the media because a brilliant style of the time they unfold propaganda.

2016-12-14 16:41:55 · answer #6 · answered by byro 4 · 0 0

Israeli army are the cowards who hide behind their airplanes and tanks, attacking innocent children and women by air strikes, and not having guts to do ground combats face to face with hezbollah.
looooooooooooosers!

2006-07-30 21:50:49 · answer #7 · answered by Aby 3 · 0 0

Is it smart to hide behind innocent men, women and children?

The answer to this question is yes if you are a coward!!!

Best Wishes and Good Fortune.

2006-07-30 21:40:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They are using the tatics that worked for the VC in the Vietnam war. Very effective. That can't compete face to face.

2006-07-30 21:35:26 · answer #9 · answered by haterade 3 · 0 0

It takes a fan of an Oxycotin addict to come up with a question this bright. Go Rush GO!

2006-07-30 21:34:41 · answer #10 · answered by corpuscollossus 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers