Yeah, you sore losers, get over it! We have to join hands to fight terrorism. But of course that won't happen because you losers hate GWB more that the terrorists.
2006-07-30 18:34:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I am sorry you sick of hearing about it.I do question your knowledge obout the electonic voting machines which have been proven byMercuri and students at several Universities.Further in RFK's investigation hedefitively proved how the election was stolen. found thousands of ballots thrown out.Rep.Conyers investigation went into the depths of how Ohio was stolen.Do you recall the news footage of people standing in line at1:00am. The reason we need to know about this is that we beleive in a real vote not one from a banana republic.You are equally ignorant about the fact of FL. For the first time a Supreme Court stopped the recount for a vote.That is not winning.Your president will go down as the worst in US history along with the most corrupt administration,cheerful in their rise to power as a criminal elite.WE must be sure we can fix the voting problems so another monster doesn't arise the same way.Our ntional debt has the potential to ruin this country,economically we are a basket case thanks to George and his merry thiefs.
2006-07-31 01:44:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by tortola89 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Clinton won reelection in the biggest landslide ever meaning that there probably wasn't cheating involved because it would be VERY hard to conceal a scam on that kind of scale. On the other hand Bush won in a very close race when all the polls suggested he would lose. Plus, some of the statistics look pretty weird. Remember all of those people's votes in Florida that were removed? The same thing happened in many of the most democratic areas in Ohio. Nothing like that happened when Clinton was elected.
2006-07-31 01:14:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by soonerfan237 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I'm not a "sore loser." I'm a sore winner!
I voted for Bush in 2000! But about 3 weeks after I did so, when I heard that he was going to ask for an injunction to stop the ballot counting in Florida, I became very worried. And then when I heard his so-called legal arguments for why he thinks that what was going on in Florida was "unconstitutional," I started pounding my head on the nearest post! If I were a federal judge listening to those arguments, I'd have laughed Dubya right out of my courtroom! And when the Supreme Dictators granted his request, I knew that Democrats were never going to accept the ruling as "legitimate" and I knew that they were RIGHT not to accept it!
I will never "get over" the Supreme Court's ruling in Bush v. Gore. Five Supreme Court Justices maybe "stole" the election and maybe they didn't. BUT THEY TRIED TO!!!
2006-07-31 01:30:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
IF Kerry had won the electoral vote and not the popular vote, what would the Dems stance be on this issue? I think not. If Gore had won his own state of TN, this would even be an issue. For the record, I think Reagan won over Carter and Mondale a lot more than Clinton won over Dole. I could be wrong though.
2006-07-31 01:35:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by haterade 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I certainly won't. It proves that the electoral system is ineffective and does not truly represent the majority. We have the technology, and ability, to use popular vote. We should use it.
2006-07-31 01:12:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by cyanne2ak 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Supposedly JFK had mob help stealing his election, so both parties arent immune to criticism.
2006-07-31 01:14:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Those who choose to ignore the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.
2006-07-31 01:20:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by quikzip7 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
this country was stolen
stolen from the native americans
stolen from the people
stolen from nature
2006-07-31 01:13:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kreep 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok. I got over it. Thanks.
2006-07-31 01:12:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by SkinnyJeff 2
·
0⤊
0⤋