1) yes because then i could get to work on time
2) yes because they are waaaay too expensive at the moment
3) no because then kids would drink it and even though it would be funny to see some 8 year old stagger around and try to hit on his mum, it's probably not a good idea.
2006-07-30 22:52:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by superspongeseven 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. People have proven they are too stupid to look out for their own safety and the safety of others. Strippers being free would have no real impact at all and doesn't matter. As for alcohol being as cheap as water, well again, it doesn't matter.
2006-07-31 01:11:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by cyanne2ak 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO.
1) and 3)-- deadly combination.
2) Strippers- would likely lead to something else... which would lead to increased rate of STDs, and I'm sure there would be other unpleasant side effects.
2006-07-31 01:12:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by ATWolf 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO. I sure as hell don't need a drunk stripper speeding down my road!
2006-07-31 01:13:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by wi_saint 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, no.
1) Car crashes galore!
2) Porn tears families apart.
3) Alcohol "____________".
2006-07-31 01:11:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by T Buhler 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no speed limits and alcohol will kill you...strippers (me) and dancers (my girllover) totally rule!!!
2006-07-31 01:20:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by J. T. N 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
GGGGG-UNOOOT
BLACK WALL STREET 4 LIFE
g-unit sukks
its 5-0 cent ....say it outl oud...five, o cent cause he a snitch
GGGG-UNNOOOOT
2006-07-31 01:12:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by downdeefield 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
4) there were no humans
2006-07-31 01:10:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Violet UK 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There were no terrorists.
2006-07-31 01:12:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mary L. S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋