well if its a teen or preteen girl have a baby at a early age and want to give it up?

Answer 1

If a pre teen or teenager is pregnant and wants to give their child up to adoption, then she needs to go to an adoption agency to start the processing of finding a family and whether she wants an open or closed adoption.

Also, familes can adopt the infant too. Let say her aunt, her uncle, her mother, her grandmother, her brother, her sister or any other family relative who wants to adopt.

Also, the father of the baby has to be contacted and given up his rights to. It is only right and only fair. Unless he is unfit to fatherhood by family court.

If she doesn't want to go through with the pregnancy, then she should seek abortion if she is pro choice.

Answer 2

depends on the situation, if they arent that young and mature enough to handle takin care of a child of there own they i think that they should try it an if they are mentally and financally stable for it. If not i think that if they are under the age of 16 that they should have an abortion cuz there is no way that they can support that baby by themselves unless they have an 17-18 year old boyfriend who is gonna help support it or have there parents

Answer 3

the actual incontrovertible reality that something develop into considered ‘regular’ in the previous doesn’t recommend that it ought to correctly be ideal perpetually. in the 1600’s lower than British rule, 12-12 months-olds were sentenced to lack of existence for stealing a loaf of bread. You don’t trust me, properly? I referred to it in a documentary on PBS relating findings of easily trial records from that era. I’m no longer making this up. I have a e book titled ‘A historic past of Western Philosophy’ with suggestions from Bertrand Russell. in this e book that is asserted that for the period of historic Greece, protection rigidity commanders ought to attempt to make their infantrymen gay. The reasoning: so as that the warriors does no longer be distracted from their protection rigidity missions with suggestions from ideas of sex with women persons and a consequent favor to leave the protection rigidity. at found in u . s . of america being gay remains authentic grounds for dismissal from the protection rigidity. So, what's “traditionally” moral will develop into immoral with the passage of time (consisting of sex with a 13-y.o.) and what's immoral will develop into moral (consisting of wearing a mini-skirt in public). --------------- the authentic situation is that a 13-y.o. is considered immature and manipulatable. I see no longer something incorrect with 2 13-y.o.’s taking area in round with one yet another. even if it does scare human beings at the same time as there's a huge age distinction. the phobia is that the older individual is by some skill conning or pressuring the more youthful individual into submission. even if, likely unbeknownst to you, many U.S. states enable the marriage of a 14-y.o. to some different person elderly 14 and up if both moms and dads of the 14-y.o.(s) consent to the marriage. (That regulation doesn’t especially verify with sexual sex.) -------------- i'm male and at the same time as i develop into 13 i ought to have gladly plowed a number of my intense college instructors if the prospect had provided itself. yet enable’s face it; women are considered as better susceptible than boys. If I had a 13-y.o. daughter who develop into courting a boy elderly better than 15 i ought to be worried. (and that i somewhat couldn’t see myself as an grownup doing a 13-y.o. Dude, she’s like a touch toddler. How waiting can she be for you?)

Answer 4

I don't quite understand what the question is. But do not have an abortion it is just plain wrong and evil.