Is this statement true......?

Question

the best way to defeat America, would be to join us...........This statement comes from ONE of my favorite quotes of the bible, Jesus says a house cant stand against itself, now he was talking about demons, but i think it applies to everything. Form within a house you can do three thing, first you can destory/corrupt it from the core, second you can remodel/change it, third you can add yourself to the foundation, and make it stronger,those going blindly into it.

And if you look at poilitics this proves it, because its a balance of powers, now i can say something and have the world may agree, those adding to my power, but another person could do the opposite, and lose power, but then by joining me, he can twist my power and bend it to work differently to his advantage......poilitics and religion who knew..

Just think if all our enemies join us, then they will take power away from us, and redistrbute it else where, those where defeated. And since there apart of us we can reap them out, because for one were weaker, and two there apart of us. Maybe a civil war.

we cant reap them out.

And I wasnt thinking about us, american poilitic, verse american politics, but i have thought of that in the past, and it could work, we would all be confused but it could work. im thinking more on the lines of the world, the one world government we all fear. And ending of this world problems by, using ourselves aginst ourselves, I post a ? like this before, when I said we should allow our enemies to think were helping them, but in reality we have more power, Like the Iran and the nuclear inrichment.

I see where ur having problems understanding, but I heard a joke the other day. I you cant beat them join them, then when there comfortable around you kick there a$$, but Im leaning towards the idea of not conforming but adding, not war and violence, but influence, and think of this what if the jews joined hitler and he got to know them, and understand them, and they cheered him on.

See you all must read past the part where I said I took this from the words of Jesus, jesus says trun the other check, and go with the flow in other words, make yourself look weak, but be strong, and you win

I really see now where ur having the problem, instead of where I talk about taking power away from, thing more so on the line where i say redistribute it: instead of negative and positive, think nuetral, balanced and equal

This is the last thing I will add, but I know most ppl fear a one world government, but what if thats what another power, wants you to do, think of this: A cattle rancher lines its cows up, and up cages around them, and uses a cattle prod to make them walk to there doom, but it is where they are being proded, that they can find safety, understand this story, do not let fear lead you, because thats where your in most danger, conquer your fear by walking towards it, and be safe. Fear is what controls our whole existence, so when we stop being afraid, we gain power over our lives. A one world government will have the power to bring us togeather, scienctific minds will be able to come together on one accord a end all diesases, fameine, and so forth. Take the bible again, what was the tower of babel, it was a great monument of human existance, created by a combined effort. but with that effort, we must apply it accordinly, so no more tower od babel, or WMDS

well miss girlnblack I will have to disagree, and the reason being is that, and yes the mighty makes history but the weak writes the books. Is it not possible to defeat a person, to change a person, to build up a person, by being nuetral, this theory is called Zin, and theres Three main Zins, Positive when your Attacking, Negitive when your retreating, and Nuetral when you do nothing, apply this to your life as you please, Jesus tought neutral, and who won that battle, yes he died, but walk up a city street and tell me he didnt win, theres a church on almost every street. Be Nuetral, is what I should asked, by saying defeat, i imply the other Zins, but no Im implying Nuetral

this came from another question same topic and everything

Answer: That might work, but I would not recommend it
as dishonesty would play a big part in this kind of
situation, and we should never include dishonesty
in trying to work out any kind of a solution to any problem.
Wisdom is to use truth and honor.

My Added Details: Well Miss ButterCup, I must say, and I will agree with you, but enter into my gates to pull my flowers, but see the buety of my garden and you shall pull my weeds.
You can come into something dishonest, but come out honest, this is also a teaching of Jesus(although speacking of food) what goes in does not matter, but what comes out causes you to sin, its the same thing.

See Im trying to use this philosophy now to sulupt minds, and change the world for the better, and Im using what most care about, and i can added anything, that you care about to do so, and with that i can do those three thing, but I only care about one the middle, to change.

Christainity will play a big part in changing this earth, so using Jesus you grab ppl to your beliefs, but then I will have to deal with another fear, the anti-christ, Im scared that i may be him, but my hearts pure, and I hope im not

I forgot about you miss girlnblack, history is not onlywriten by the weak it is change by the weak, Martin Luther King, Jesus, Ghandi, and how many other ppl, and there in there history books, oh another America, once the weaker, but America used another Zin, it used the Postive one, but if we used neutral, not a single person would have died, and we wouldn't of had start off a counrty in debt. Yes and the others died, but we still live for them today, its amazing isnt it. Might can also be a weaknest, when up agaisnt a nuetral power.

Answer 1

I only have two things for you to factor into your train of thought:

"Might is right"... i.e., losers don't write the history books, and "to the victor go the spoils". So, yes, I understand and agree RE: the balance of powers. Think about how many voters in the US wait until the final hour to vote just so they can vote for the winner and say they did. _?!_ I'll never understand that logic!

And along another tangent, "a chain is only as strong as its weakest link"... So if a faction wanted to subvert the American government, it would be best accomplished from within.

I realize I have been misinterpreted. I do not believe that it is proper that might is right but it is a concept popular among historians and social scientists. To borrow from Mandela, who borrowed from Williamson, "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate.
Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure... "
http://www.goodworksonearth.org/nelsonmandela2.html

I do, however, disagree RE: who writes history. Yes, portions of the overcome faction may survive to write their side of the story, but generally the winning team/army is who survives in greater quantity to write, publish, and mass-market their side of the story, and three guesses which ends up in the hands of our students.

Answer 2

The great Empire of Babylon and the great Empire of Rome crumbled from within. In fact many Empires crumble from within versus being defeated in battle. The United States has been slowly, imperceptibly, steadily self corrupting from the inside out. The elite of every nation is quietly pushing things toward a global governance.
Economic crises will hasten that goal to completion. It is just a matter of time until the United States is dictated to, no longer the one that dictates to others. They have us by the cajones, and one day they will squeeze. I foresee a world wide economic collapse engineered for the creation of a new world order. Famine will be more widespread to control the masses. With GE foods they will be able to do it. It is just a matter of time.

What have we done to future generations? Our forefathers started us off so well. How did America depart from their guidance?

Answer 3

How would it defeat America if others were to join us?????

It would be about defeating hatred, violence, unrest and dictatorship. It would mean finding freedom and harmony.

This is not a defeat but a triumph.

Join my house and learn what I have learned. The answer is love not hate, peace not war, decency not corruption.

When you find that in my house, you will know how to start your own house......triumph.

Answer 4

I think I understand what you're asking...

the one negative, and it's a whopper, is that you often discourage people from speaking their opinions on bad ideas, everyone has bad ideas, and if people won't say "hey, that's a bad idea"... then those bad ideas will become bad policies...

there is a danger to what you're saying... Nazi Germany was founded on the loyal nationalism you speak of... no one wanted to stand up and say "hey, that's a bad idea to kill all the Jews"... because if you did that, then you're trying to "make trouble" and you "sympathize with the enemy"...

Answer 5

I don't really understand what you're asking.

But I don't think we should all conform and back the people in power just because they're in power. If so, then that would excuse the Germans for supporting Hitler.

Answer 6

Yes, I'm confused as well.. Are you saying that Americans should all jump on George's bandwagon in order to sway the government to actually care about the people?? I don't think that would work, they'd just screw us over even more..

Answer 7

it started out good, but kind of lost it in the end

Answer 8

I simply don't get the gist of your summation.

Answer 9

?