And why?
2006-07-30 14:21:07 · 9 answers · asked by Road Trip 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
20. It was a great year. There were also some things I did that I shouldn't have done, didn't do that I should've done, said that I shouldn't have said and didn't say that I should have said.
I was young and foolish. To be able to go back there with the knowledge and wisdom that I have today, I would.
2006-07-31 11:50:45 · answer #1 · answered by sexychik1977 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you've written is notably sturdy - even if Y!A seems to have amputated its legs. I even ought to assert I disagree with you about training creationism and evolution concurrently, on countless grounds: o both are on no account equivalent. Evolution is a properly-prevalent incontrovertible reality that has survived assaults with suggestions from discovered biologists for one hundred fifty years without a blemish, and each and each and every new discovery in biology merely confirms and expands it. Creationism is a ludicrous con-trick without foundation in reality in any respect. o little ones will not often have the ability to judge the benefits of such issues, even if. The assaults made on evolution with suggestions from creationists are facile and stupid, and characteristic all been discredited - yet a school pupil can't understand this, nor to have the ability to appreciate the themes in contact or the technological understanding that ought to be utilized. evaluate a number of those 'arguments': did you recognize why Polonium haloes are on no account evidence or a mushy Earth? are you conscious of the precursors of the bacterial flagellum - like the variety 5 Secretory equipment - that educate the flagellum isn't 'irreducibly complicated'? in case you do, you're brilliant, and likely uncommon. maximum college pupil gained't have the guidelines to take care of themselves adversarial to such garbage. ninety 9% and bigger biologists have little doubt about evolution's validity. it is a case the position the information ought to study. scholars can make certain them at their leisure at the same time as they have the historic past ideas required.
2016-11-27 00:25:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think I'd want to go back and re-live any age. Past life maybe, but not any age in this life. Too many hard times and hard lessons.
2006-07-30 14:47:19 · answer #3 · answered by Jylsamynne 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would want to be 4-6 years old. Could just play all day long, no school, no worries etc. And best of all the cartoons in the 80's were awesome. ;)
2006-07-30 15:55:22 · answer #4 · answered by finnish_rose 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd need to be at least 15.......that's when all the major drug experimentation started happening in my life. It was about 17 yrs later that I was arrested and it has taken me years to even make minor steps in recovering a good life.
2006-07-30 14:25:25 · answer #5 · answered by Nagitar™ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to be about 7 or 8 again. It'd be nice to go back to elementary school. I miss it quite a bit.
2006-07-30 14:26:05 · answer #6 · answered by Lauren 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd wish to be 33 again. I still had my looks, physique and vigor. It's all been downhill from there except for intelligence. Think that part's improved but still miss the rest.
2006-07-30 14:27:40 · answer #7 · answered by Apex 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I could keep all my current memories and knowledge I'd go way back like 6. That'd be fun.
2006-07-30 14:25:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
20...............I had a blast in college!!! I had a great job and made decent money..........no kids, no spouse, no bills.........lots of fun!
2006-07-30 14:25:33 · answer #9 · answered by copchick2m7 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋