2006-07-30 14:03:24 · 16 answers · asked by collegedebt 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
We need a New Whig Party.
2006-07-30 14:06:15 · answer #1 · answered by Chuck Dhue 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There have been many parties running for president each election period. I think you're talking about a third major party. It's been tried before with very little success. Ross Perot tried it in 1992 and he just might have won if he didn't turn cloth and bail out at the last minute. It could happen again but not in our lifetime. It's like anything, it takes generations for things to change.
2006-07-30 15:06:36 · answer #2 · answered by The Mick "7" 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
United states has become morally corrupt. we have enough money and determination to blow away two countries,get involved in Lebanon's fight with Israel (by the way do some research on who controlls all the water that goes to Lebanon). Sell fighter planes to Taiwan (3 billion dollars worth)so they can be ready to blow up North Korea. But we will not stop the genocide in Africa. A change is due.
2006-07-30 14:37:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer think of there is unquestionably one of those situation as a practicable 0.33 social gathering. that's regrettably, yet maximum pass in and pull a lever and little or no thought is going into it. on an identical time as on the outdoors it may appear like a good situation, it might basically reason extra issues then it might remedy. For one situation if no social gathering had a majority in congress it might set off off extra desirable payoffs to the swing votes to get legislations via. it might additionally complicate and water down the vote so as that in keeping with possibility a extra clever candidate could no longer get elected with the aid of fact it might split the vote 3 strategies instead of two. So in my view no usa isn't waiting to have a 0.33 social gathering.
2016-11-03 08:18:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about America but I sure am. I want to see change. It seems all that the two primary parties can do is try to crush each other which makes them extremely ineffective.
2006-07-30 14:12:05 · answer #5 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They try the 3 party thing every election but has not worked as yet
2006-07-30 14:07:58 · answer #6 · answered by stillhappy89 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the first two parties on top have certainly not come up with anyone worth walking to the polls to support.
2006-07-30 14:05:44 · answer #7 · answered by Elwood 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes if she is a moderate and can work with both sides. If she is farther to the right of the R's or to the Left of the D's then no.
2006-07-30 14:08:13 · answer #8 · answered by Salem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a libertarian, I hope so.
Yet it won't happen in 2008. Hillary Rodham Clinton is the next POTUS.
2006-07-30 14:07:26 · answer #9 · answered by Suit of Flames 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on that party's platform and that president's willingness to deal with the corruption and greed..
2006-07-30 14:05:07 · answer #10 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋