11
2006-07-30 13:51:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by justnotright 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
2
2006-07-30 13:51:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by pattie_hardesty 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
7
2006-07-30 13:54:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dusty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
8
2006-07-30 13:54:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chris W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's President Bush, biatch!
7
2006-07-30 13:57:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by anonymosity 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
9, I just wish he was calling the UN on it's short comings and push for the UN to reform or disband because they are and have become a clear fraudulent waste of money. Nice idea but humans aren't ready for planetary Government.
2006-07-30 14:03:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by spider 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the first gentleman to answer this question is either a crackhead or delusional. Anyway I rate it at -10
2006-07-30 13:52:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kookie M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 0, big ZERO. I mean 0 like 0. D'you know what I mean? Z.E.R.O. Like Smashing Pumpkins' song called ZERO. Yea, it's 0.
2006-07-30 13:52:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ch'é'étiin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
current events as in right now... or overall?
his "lack of action" in the Israeli situation is one of the best actions of his presidency (which isn't saying much) ... if only he would have "not acted" in some other situations too...
if you're saying "current" as in past few weeks... 4.. stem cell issue didn't impress me...
2006-07-30 13:54:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
9.5 (minus .5 for sending Condi to the Middle East. We just need to stay out of this, no matter how much the UN cries for us to get involved).
Ahh Zidane, typical liberal. Just more immature name calling without any real substance. Thanks for perpetuating the stereotype.
2006-07-30 13:52:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Amy H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋