English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-30 12:30:29 · 53 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

Im from the Uk so dont know much about him or what he has done

2006-07-30 12:34:03 · update #1

53 answers

Let me put it this way....

He is a coward and a war monger (not a good combination)

And to add to that, if he lived in the UK (and had the same IQ) he would be living in sheltred accomodation.

He is a danger to every living thing on the face of this planet.

2006-07-30 12:48:43 · answer #1 · answered by haplesboylard 4 · 4 1

They don't. The news however does. He is president at a hard time. The goal of the media in the US is to get ratings for commercials at any light. So making the government look bad and dumb is a good way to do this. So they twist stories to do this. He is the top person so when another politician is attacked they just push the blame to him.

My best example is after the hurricane they asked someone why it was 2 days until they had helicopters into the city. The answer was "it took that long for the weather to become calm enough to fly a helicopter without crashing it," then the news person said that is no excuse not to get the helicopters with aid in. They like never mentioned in the news after it happened that free busses out of the city were provided or that the people were given 3 days to get out. They also did not mention the roads out of the city were not crowded before it hit or that pretty much everyone on a house roof had a car half underwater in the drive. It was all about how the president was not doing enough to help those people.

I mean come on that is good unbiased reporting.

2006-07-31 01:39:13 · answer #2 · answered by thatoneguy 4 · 0 0

He's disrespected our Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
He got into a war out of vengeance, not for any good reason.
He's not the sharpest tool in the shed (Only morons say "new-cue-lar" for nuclear) and shouldn't be allowed to speak without a script.
He's for big business and against the little guy.
His actions in the world (including disrespecting the UN and refusing to sign the Kyoto accord) have made the U.S. even more hated by other countries.
Our economy has gone to crap because of him.
He's trying to impose a theocracy on us.
I could go on, but these are enough.

Edit: To everyone who blames the media for making him seem stupid...First, they don't need to try. Second, what do you think would happen if the "liberal media" just up and came to a screeching halt? You'd have the right-wing bible-thumpers left who only say what the president wants you to hear. The media is there as another check in the system of checks and balances to keep an eye on the government FOR THE PEOPLE. If the media didn't watch them and bring issues to light, nobody'd have any rights any more. STOP HATING THE MEDIA!

2006-07-30 12:38:30 · answer #3 · answered by RQ1227 3 · 0 0

When Bush took office in the US he seemed to think it included the rest of the world. The Americans may have voted him in but he has managed to look like he is on the quest for world domination. The problem the economy. Whatever Bush does cost money and not just to the American people. Bush goes to war...oil prices jump in the rest of the world. The next presidential elections should include voting from other countries seeing how the American government have so much influence over them all.

2006-08-03 08:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by Female Alert 1 · 0 0

Outstanding President,Just Needs To Keep Holdin Em By Nose, And Kick Em In The **** A Little Harder!

2006-07-30 12:38:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't hate Bush, I just don't think her latest album is quite up to the standard of 'Hounds of Love' or some of her other previous... oh, you mean George Dubya. Yes, he's a vainglorious little coward, with a disturbing father-complex, dangerous religious mania, and moral scruples shaped from shuffling round Texas in his alligator boots. He is also sufficiently self-deluded, deranged and self-righteous to unleash World War III if we're not careful.
Kate, on the other hand, is a sweetie.

2006-08-02 05:13:26 · answer #6 · answered by Tyler's Mate 4 · 0 0

Because there's no sensationalistic ratings boost in liking anybody. It rarely matters who holds what office, as long as the media can generate an ongoing negative buzz to boost their ratings and circulation. People in this country are generally so conditioned to believe what they see and hear on TV that they automatically dislike who they are told to. The media rarely tells the straight truth about anything. That's boring. They have to generate a sinister conspiracy or a coverup on a regular basis to beat the last week's ratings. Freedom of the press has turned this country into a bunch of spoonfed defectives.

2006-07-30 12:38:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You're from the UK and that's the reason why you don't know what the sate of the World is in? I always thought Great Britain had Newspapers, Radio and Television. Guess I was wrong. You probably have to go to France to get on Yahoo ... you poor dear.

2006-07-30 12:46:04 · answer #8 · answered by Sam 7 · 0 0

Don't listen to those idiots above. Liar, murderer? Blood on his hands? In my opinion, those people can go suck something.

Here is my take: Bush is viewed by those outside of America as a war-monger. They perceive him as stirring up trouble.

Well he had no choice but to go kick some *** after our country was attacked by a bunch of fanatic Muslims. We are a peace-loving country, but when someone hits you, you have to hit back.

Bush did. Most of the rest of the world seems to be disagreeable with that, so they hate Bush.

2006-07-30 12:49:13 · answer #9 · answered by Max Power 1 · 0 0

r u seriously asking this? Look at what he has done. He destroyed our economy, which was prosperous befroe he was in;, he has us in a war that we shouldnt be in in the first place; he is doing nothing for our people but everything for everyone else, and he is just plain stupid. He has done ONE good thing that I know of. That was signing a bill that protects wild horses. But the fact that he let the slaughter houses open back up and running cancels that out.

2006-07-30 12:35:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have never met PRESIDENT Bush, so I can't say whether I like him or not. I'm not intellectually challenged or DEFICIENT and actually, I'm not even a Republican.However, I don't think many people could have led our country better the last six years, except maybe me, lol. J/K. I do wish we could raise FDR from the dead though, he would have been awesome right about now! And, oh yeah, he was a Democrat, not that it matters...
So here's why I approve of PRESIDENT Bush as President:
He hasn't defended himself on Hurricane Katrina. Everyone wants to blame him, but really, Louisiana is NOT the only state that was heavily damaged by the hurricane. What about Mississippi? Oh, that's right, their STATE government took care of them...and they asked for federal aid immediately. In New Orleans, it was announced by the mayor, the senator, and the governor that they did not need federal aid the day after the hurricane. Yet after all hell broke loose, the National Guard was sent in...and quickly.
The wire-tapping was a great idea. Too bad the media got ahold of it. Why was it a great idea? Because it allowed the government to listen in on calls placed from known Al Qaida operatives to the US. They were NOT listening in on Joe Schmoe telling his best friend how much p***y he got the other night, or Jane Doe telling her sister how much pot she smoked. So, nice job media, ruining that one.
The so-called "leak", which was in fact the disclosure of DECLASSIFIED information. The CIA agent that was "outed" hadn't been a covert agent for over five years. Yet President Bush isn't defending himself on that either.
He's been accused of "lying" about the WMD's, and yet hasn't defended himself. I really wish people would get over that one, because no matter how many times they're told that the Democrats "lied", and the soldiers over there (and who were there in the last three years) that have found evidence that there HAD been WMD's also "lied"...they won't listen.
I could say much more on how he's NOT a bad president, but I'm not going to waste my time. If some of these people REALLY wanted to know, they would watch FahrenHYPE 9/11 (which disproves much of Michael Moore's lovely
"documentary"), stop watching Loose Change, and maybe take a look at truthorfiction.com, snopes.com, popularmechanics.com (and search for the story about debunking the 9/11 conspiracy myths), or www.strategypage.com (and search for the story on the War in Iraq).
Here's what I like about President Bush:
He's true to his word, especially away from the cameras. I've heard many stories about how he shows his respect for our Armed Forces members, has taken the time to pray with someone just because they asked him, given hugs and comfort to those who have lost loved ones in 9/11 and the War...
Overall, he shows his integrity in private. That's what matters most to me. I couldn't care less about how well he speaks (or doesn't, as we all know is true), because that's his public face.
I like the fact that he illegalized partial-birth abortion within his first few months in office, yet has left abortion alone other than that, even though he feels it's wrong.
I love the fact that he doesn't listen to the war protesters, and instead listens to the soldiers on the ground. Most of them say we CAN'T pull out...and we'd better not. Also, many of them have said that even though they were injured, they would go again and again. I saw that on, if I remember correctly, CBS news, which, as most conservatives know, leans to the left. I've also talked to many soldiers myself, and most of them have told me the same thing.
Most people that have met him say he's not the "bumbling idiot" many think he is. He's actually very poised, respectful, and most of all, he demands respect without saying a word. I've known people that met the President, one of which didn't like him at all until they met him, and voted for him in 2004 based on their impressions.
This is a man that despite the opposition, has offered very little criticism. Sure, he said to the UN, "If you're not with us, you're against us." He was right at the time, and now...they're with us. Even the UN has admitted that we're doing a fine job in Iraq, and that the country's come along infinitely quicker than they initially thought. More countries are volunteering to help us, too.
I would put more reasons, but I figure it's a waste of time. I'm not going to convince anyone that I'm right, and anyone that already has an opinion isn't open to anything else.
I'll just put it this way: I've heard all the reasons that people hate President Bush, and not one of them is valid. Not one of them holds any weight, or contains logic. And believe me when I say that I WANT to hear a real reason to hate the guy, just so I don't have to face the fact that most of my friends are wrong

2006-08-01 19:29:54 · answer #11 · answered by chippychip 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers