English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

I don't eat meat, fish or poultry, but in cases of low food supply, it would be OK for someone to kill and eat an animal. I never want to, but my problem is with the killing houses, the way the chickens never get to step on grass and the inhumane way they kill livestock.

2006-07-30 12:22:31 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1 1

I am much more concerned about the violations and cruelty of vegetarians. At least animals can try to run away or defend themselves. Those poor, helpless, defenseless veggies do not even have any chance to escape or cry out for help before they are slaughtered and coated in ranch dressing.

2006-07-30 20:03:46 · answer #2 · answered by rp_iowa 3 · 0 0

Uhhh I think its ok to eat chickens....its not really cruelty. You cant call a wolf cruel for eating a rabbit.

Im so deep.

2006-07-30 19:19:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Man was given dominion over the animals. We were made "stewards" of God's creations. There will be consequences to those who abuse, misuse, and waste God's creations.

2006-07-30 19:18:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't have a problem with eating meat.
I have a gripe about the trophy or thrill killing of animals.

2006-07-30 19:53:24 · answer #5 · answered by jfmm 7 · 0 0

Eating animals is fine. Has PETA ever protested on a savanna because lions kill gazelle? Didn't think so

2006-07-30 19:28:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If it's alive, it must taste good. If animals have rights, let them defend themselves. Otherwise, pass the barbeque sauce and shut your mouth.

2006-07-30 19:19:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hmmm--I didn't think I ate like a chicken, but you could be right !!

2006-07-30 19:21:55 · answer #8 · answered by MIGHTY MINNIE 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers