who was a worse leader, G.W. Bush or A. Hitler?

Question

Explain your answer.

If people don't think Bush is a murderer, what would you 9?11?

and what does being a German-American has to do with anything?

Just to clairify, Hitler was NEVER elected to office, he was appointed Chancellor, the siezed power after that.

Bush was never "LEGALLY" elected President. He was "ILLEGALLY"APPOINTED President by the Supreme Court in 2000, and committed mass voter fraud (ie: rigged the electronic voting machines) in 2004.

Answer 1

Bush. Bush is stirring up war in the middle east just to rake oil profits into his blind trust. Who knows how many will be dead before it is over? The media doesn't tell us how many women and children are dying daily. And, this will go on and on for God know how long.

Even after he is out of office, people will still hate Americans for what he has done and is doing. He has made sure terrorism will live forever in the United States. He has assured that terrorism will reach unbridled heights in the middle east.

He is a horrible person.

Answer 2

LOL. To answer your question as to being a worst leader, I would have to say Bush is technically, since he has lost teh support of most people and has had terrible foreign relations. Hitler on teh other hand, got the support of every Aryan person, restored Germany from depression to economic boom, and trhough cunning discussion, regained Czechoslovakia, the Rhineland, and was fending off teh Allies until America joined in. However, while Bush is stupid, Hitler is evil. Bush may make all the wrong decisions, but he hasn´t and never will deliberately killed six million jews, among millions of jehovah´s witnesses, gypsies, homosexuals, mentally and physically ill people. He has however, indirectly killed many innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush is a blind and mindless fool who kills, Hitler was a massacring madman who had no respect for a human life, and who wanted to have plain Aryan supremacy (alhtough he mightve been mentally ill, as some sources stated).

Answer 3

They are both equally bad. Although Bush has yet to reach the number of people that Hitler killed, he has however, put people into those kinds of conditions blindly.

Both were elected in democratic elections.

Bush - self-proclaimed christian (he is actually a hypocrit)
Hitler - catholic (also actually a hypocrit)

Both have war on the brain. Both are seeking to put fear into the rest of the world. Both lied to their people. Both invaded soverign nations.

I am sure there are more similarities, but my fingers are tired right now.

Answer 4

Leader or murderer? Two different things. GW is a terrible leader but hardly a murderer in the sense or proportions of Hitler

Answer 5

Hitler. he did more damage over a longer period of time and is directly responsible for the deaths of 6,000,000 Jews; 240,000 Jehovah's Witnesses and 100,000 Basque Gypsies. Bush will never be that bad.

Answer 6

Well before the mass genocide he was actually a good leader. Dictatorship on paper is a good form of government but the leaders always are corrupt.

Answer 7

Adolf Hitler was a true leader in every sense of the word.

George Bush is a simple-minded Jewish sock puppet.

Answer 8

Jimmy Carter---Award for solid intentions and unwell geared up Richard Nixon. thank you for ending Vietnam. rattling you on your evils. Filmore who? Buchanan-thank you for doing no longer something different than warming the seat for Abe. Andrew Johnson thank you for fouling Lincoln's Reconstruction hopes. See we've had worse. continuously anticipate greater to come again.

Answer 9

If you keep this narrowly construed to "leadership ability", then it would be Hilter. Why? He was able to get men under his leadership to kill millions of people (not by bombing, but nearly on a one-to-one basis, look them in the eye and kill them in cold blood) at his direction. That, is truly powerful.

Answer 10

Hmmm. Hitler had a booming economy for 12 years.....

What sort of asshole asks a question like this anyway?