cause my other qb is matt hasselbeck and my rbs r McGahee,k jones,f gore
2006-07-30 11:48:41 · 7 answers · asked by John 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Mike Vick for Tom Brady is a great trade. Brady led the league last year with passing yards (4,110) and threw 26 TD passes. Vick is always prone to injuries and is recovering from one now.
Rudi Johnson (1,458 rush yards, 12 TDs) is probably going to get more carries this season because of Carson Palmer's injury. Willie Parker (1,202 rush yards, 4 TDs) will probably become the starter for Pittsburgh. I'd say Rudi Johnson is the one you want on your team. Him and McGahee will make your team's rushing very strong.
2006-07-30 12:50:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO DONT MAKE THE TRADE. While the Tom Brady for Michael Vick trade is enticing you don't need Tom Brady you already have Hasselback, and he will put up similar numbers to Brady. Rudi Johnson will continue to rush for 1,400 yds and score double digit TD's. Willie Parker will go over 1,200 yds but will only score 8 TD's at the most. Not Worth It.
DON'T MAKE THE TRADE
2006-07-30 14:26:42 · answer #2 · answered by Taylor C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rudi is an animal.
Hasselbeck/Brady are a wash in fant. football if you look at the #'s .Hasselbeck probably has better wideouts as well.
Rudi has not missed a game in a long time too.Very healthy for a r.b.
2006-07-30 15:17:19 · answer #3 · answered by croshow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'd take brady for vick if i were you but parker wont do **** without the bus taking the bang up the middle, so you should keep rudi.
2006-07-30 14:33:37 · answer #4 · answered by shektor9 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES YES YES and do it quickly before the other guy wakes up and realizes your getting the better end of this deal.
2006-07-30 12:28:39 · answer #5 · answered by all8upchamp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would keep Rudi
2006-08-03 10:50:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a no brainer to me, Yes
2006-08-03 11:22:18 · answer #7 · answered by terps 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋