2006-07-30 11:10:59 · 59 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Rude...NO
2006-07-30 11:13:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
if u kill animals for no reason then its cruel but if u kill to put a animal out of pain and suffering then its acceptable but if u could get it too a vets would be a better now I'm talking about animals such as cats dogs fox bears but animals who are slaughters for food is a another story
2006-07-30 11:54:41 · answer #2 · answered by lizella 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if they are in sufferable pain, to the point where no matter what you do, they will still perish. Otherwise, NO, it is not okay, and if you'd like an explanation, or a reason to kill a living creature, how about you lock yourself in a room with me for 5 minutes- I'll change your mind!
2006-07-30 11:15:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it okay for animals to kill humans
2006-07-30 11:12:13 · answer #4 · answered by Icera 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the circumstances, of course. God gave us animals as property. Therefore, we can do with them what we please. This calls for no obvious abuse. But, you got a sick kitty, kill it. Dog with a broken leg? Kill it. Unless you're the type to spend hundreds of dollars on a piece of property, hundreds more than it's worth. So kill the dog. Go out and get another one. It's property, after all. But as to the senseless killing of animals, NO. Hunting is acceptable, assuming you use the carcass. Killing insects, as I have just SMACKED an ant off of my thigh, is good too! And please kill as many mosquitos as possible.
2006-07-30 11:18:58 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny P 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it depends. I had a dog that was very, very sick and in pain. I had it put to sleep. I think it was a humane thing to do. I did not want to see it suffer. Also, you have to kill meat before you eat it, right? That is if you aren't vegetarian. To just kill for the sake of killing is wrong and cruel.
2006-07-30 11:13:56 · answer #6 · answered by Sabina 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you are talking about killing animals for human consumption then no - however the mass slaughter will continue unabated as long as there are humans
If you are talking about killing animals for sport then its wrong, its a documented fact that animals suffer pain
If you are talking about killing for pleasure then see the above and i hope to christ you suffer as much as the animals - KARMA its a powerful thing and its coming your way
if this post is purely to get a rabid response - KARMA - what goes around comes around - so be prepared 2pts
2006-07-30 11:21:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is. For food and sport if done in a humane way. I hunt and fish and take no pleasure in watching an animal die. I try to do it in the most efficient and quick way that I can.
2006-07-30 11:18:01 · answer #8 · answered by danzka2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For food or if there is something irreparably wrong with animal. Like if it had a tumor or would die a lot more painfully if you let it go naturally. Just let the death be humane. Not something like tossing a hamster into a pot of boiling water.
2006-07-30 11:15:06 · answer #9 · answered by John W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends what you are talking about. But deaths in animal prevent overpopulation. If you don't kill them, they will only kill themselves by competing for living space and food. If your talking about killing pets, then no you shouldn't kill pet animals.
2006-07-30 11:14:12 · answer #10 · answered by Jason 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is if you are doing it for food. it isn't okay to just go out and kill an animal just because you feel like it, or you are bored.
2006-07-30 11:13:15 · answer #11 · answered by Govinda505 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋